New Year's Resolutions 2008

Disclaimer: this is one of those personal posts which I largely tend to avoid. For my political readers and friends pardon the digression. As always, please feel free to disregard.

With the dawn of a new year, folks from around the world will soon commit themselves to promises they will never keep. In the colloquial, we call these New Year's resolutions. In fact, the trend is so common the ever helpful U.S. Government even has a website devoted to some of the most popular pledges in America complete with links to help YOU in accomplishing them. The list includes paying off debt, getting a better job and drinking less alcohol.

[Link]

Fine goals all, but is there any area in which Government does not have an opinion?

Carping aside, 2007 was ubiquitously full of change. The older I get the more I realize how this is more a truism and less an insight. From a cross country move to opening, to beginning a new chapter in my life, the task would be daunting to boil down all lessons learned to a single post. But to make sense of the madness, a recent book I'm reading (though I am too embarrassed to put it on the reading list) called "The Game" offers surprising insight into processing life's vicissitudes. The selection of interest, in brief, appears while the cast of characters are discussing techniques for meeting and attracting women. Ultimately, the men arrive at a point where mere sexual conquests are no longer sufficient to boost their egos. They resolve to develop all of life's major areas: health, wealth and relationships.

This seems a good paradigm to make resolutions for 2008. I have long ascribed to the belief that the more resolutions one makes the harder it is to keep them. In turn, below is one resolution from each category for 2008.

Health: For those who know me, it will come as no surprise that law school has done a number on my health. Stress aside, the rigors of the past semester have been anything but conducive toward healthy living. Unbeknownst to me, late nights and fast food go a long way toward making one ill rather than well. Who knew frozen chimichangas could be so bad for you? Accordingly, much of this Christmas break has found me attempting to regulate my sleep and to eat balanced meals. Hence, the obvious resolution will be to live healthier on two specific fronts: More sleep. Good eats. Alton Brown would be proud.

Wealth: As a poor student, my future ability to earn a living is intimately tied to my success academically. The first semester of any new program provides a foreign challenge and mine was certainly no exception. The biggest obstacle this term was in time management, strangely. For the non-law school inclined, my problem was found in waiting too long to outline for my courses. Outlining involves creating a mini-workbook for the final examination. The idea is to include all relevant information which might be on the exam in a document as derived from class notes and study aids. Outlining for me was a good means by which to study but I found that if I had begun outlining much earlier in the course, there would be less to outline at the very end (how's that for logic). Thus, I would have more time to work on practice problems at the end of the term in advance of the exam. At any rate, I've learned that much of success in law school is simply getting organized and keeping par with the course work. Oddly, this is easier said than done but a valuable lesson all the same. The main issue here is one of volume and discipline. Habits take 30 days to form. January will be a nice test.

Relationships: Unsurprisingly, many of my relationships have also suffered since the beginning of law school. It remains challenging to strike a balance between school work and taking time for people. An abundance of one at expense of the other is problematic. It may take a considerable amount of self-will but time must be allotted for each. On a completely different front, there are also some folks from the past with whom I would like to reconnect. Nothing like the New Year to catch up with old friends. Perhaps a new someone special may figure into the relational equation as well. Of course having been out of the dating scene a while, I'll need to finish The Game to cover my bases.

Whether any of these will come to pass, like my political predictions, remain to be seen. But the promise of a fresh start is enough to provide hope for a new year.

Cheers to all and Happy 2008!

Political Predictions for 2008

I normally make a long post on political thoughts for the coming year. Oddly, the NRO made the post for me. I think the link below pretty much sums up what we can expect from the 2008 GOP primary.

[Link]

In brief, the article argues that the race will come down to Huckabee and Giuliani; and that Florida will figure big in the calculus. The author's prediction, however, is that this will ultimately tear apart Ronald Reagan's political coalition. In some ways, I can see his point given the disparate interests of the two sides (economic conservatives v. social conservatives).

In fact, as the factions battle for dominance of the party, this seems to some extent inevitable. As the political process in general grows increasingly polarized, we should only anticipate the same for intra-party squabbles. But to say the coalition is doomed to fissure seems a bit premature. Republicans have generally been fairly well able to unite behind the party nominee. Whether this is the case or not remains to be seen and I can offer no cogent projections.

Suffice it to say, I do believe that the race will come down to Huckabee and Giuliani and I do believe that Huckabee will win. Bush proved that by turning out the evangelical vote Republicans can carry the general election. The same logic as applied to the primary is that evangelical voters remain more committed to their candidate and therefore, more likely to turn out. In turn, Huckabee needs only to turn out his evangelical base and create a plurality in state contests to win.

Time will tell.

Clintons Stiff Kid Reporter

Shifting gears a bit as we wind down 2007 (New Year's resolutions will follow), the story below offered some telling insights into the campaign of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Of late, team Clinton is so concerned about their candidate derailing that they barred any campaign surrogate from answering reporters' questions.

Apparently, there is no better way to usher in Sen. Clinton's promise of 'transparent' government than to stiff the media.

What remains most odd, however, is that the ban applies even to kid reporters from local elementary schools.

[Link]

Given Bill Clinton's dalliances with interns, one might think the Clinton's would be especially adept at handling kids.

Ah, well. How surprising politics can be.

Slate: Who's responsible for Bhutto's death?

I can't resist answering: global warming.

[Link]

16-0?

Tonight the New England Patriots will be pursuing perfection.

[Link]

Tonight, for the first time, I will be rooting for the Giants.

CBS News: Can Fred Thompson Turn It Around?

In a word, no. Fred Thompson, not unlike Christmas, is done.

[Link]

Casket for Joe Paterno

A thousand apologies dear readers. I've been blogging only sporadically while on Christmas hiatus here in Oklahoma.

The following story was too large a blight on college football to ignore.

The Texas A&M casket comment is low. Even for A&M fans.

[Link]

Chaos After Bhutto Assassination

In yet another sign that our world has become increasingly interconnected, American stocks fell following the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto.

[Link]

While the facts continue to be gathered, I will refrain from offering opinion except to say how unfortunate it is that the forces of extremism would rise up to slay such a progressive stalwart of the region. Dying in the service of one's country is the ultimate sacrifice an individual can make. The West can only hope that her death will not be in vain and that cooler heads will prevail in guiding Pakistan toward stability in the coming days.

Romney Takes Heat for Backing Liberal Mayor

With the Iowa Caucuses less than a week away, Mitt Romney's record has been met with increased skepticism by conservatives.

While Romney's endorsement of Salt Lake City mayor Rocky Anderson may not necessarily provide conclusive evidence of his views, it certainly leaves room for question given Romeny's position shifts on abortion and gay marriage.

You decide.

Christmas, Suffering and Hope

There is always something special about spending Christmas here in Walters. As the family tosses a football in the yard, and the smells of Christmas dinner waft through the house, all the memories of bygone years come flooding back. This time of year seems uniquely robust in its moments of nostalgia and melancholy. In some ways, this is appropriate. Perhaps even necessary.

The lesson of Bethlehem was a much a lesson of hope as it was a lesson in suffering. The Christ-Child surely knew the sacrifice his life would elicit. In turn, Merton counsels that suffering for the Believer is to some extent natural—almost like breathing. The suffering itself when done out of so deep a love for God the act is its own consecration.

Merton explains in No Man Is an Island:

When a man suffers he is most alone. Therefore it is in suffering that we are most tested as persons. How can we face that awful interior questioning,(p.81).

This is all well and good but what has suffering to do with Christmas?

As Merton reminds us,simply this: they can be one and the same. Christmas, defined simply as Christ’s birth, marked the beginning of a life of suffering even for Jesus. Taking a personal example, my past year has marked a period of intense change, confusion and wistfulness. A veritable internal suffering, if not external. Merton’s solution for those similarly fixed is the hope of Christmas and nothing less than the example set by our Lord:

If, therefore, we desire to be what we are meant to be, and if we become what we are supposed to become, the interrogation of suffering will call forth from us both our name and the name of Jesus, (p.81).

The lesson of Bethlehem was that Immanuel—God with us—had finally been sent by the Divine (Matthew 1.23). His life would necessitate intense suffering as He sought to fulfill his charge. My charge (or yours) may not be so profound but the application is similar. Christmas is a call to desire what we are meant to be and to become what we are supposed to become even as we celebrate the life of Jesus. The means by which this occurs is suffering—that awful internal interrogation whereby we discover what we are meant to be and what we are supposed to become. On this Christmas Eve, my mind is very much fixed on how to maintain the charge—I desire my purpose and look forward to the means by which I will become what I am supposed to become. Such belief is a matter of faith.

It’s also a shift in course. For a time, I did not long for the uncertainty of the future and my will to obey was tempered by my own will to do as I would. This motivation was in turn influenced both by pain and doubt as I brooded over losses of the past. Who wouldn't like a mulligan every now and then? Fortunately, Christmas is much more progressive. It looks out with a season of hope. It prods us further along the path of where we need to be and allows us to leave behind those things which ought to be left. Rather, it causes us to stop and consider the possibilities—great and unsearchable things we cannot know (Jeremiah 33.3). Whether suffering can really be the hope of Christmas is entirely dependent upon our reaction.

In turn, our reaction should be one of faith and a prayer for a Strength that is not our own. A resultant earnest embrace of Jesus’ course will bring us closer toward that which we are to become for His purpose. This is the essence of Christmas gleaned from our Lord’s life: the Christ-child come to earth to live that he might die for our sins.

Sleep in heavenly peace.

Ron Paul's Record Under Scrutiny

Libertarian candidate Ron Paul has come under a bit of unexpected fire this week for doggedly backing earmarks for his Galveston area district. Regarding the incongruity of his record, Paul said:

“I put them in because I represent people who are asking for some of their money back,” said Paul, who likened it to taking a tax credit. “I’m against the tax system, but I take all my tax credits. I want to get their money back for the people.”

[Link]

Oddly, Congressman Paul's justification sounds an awful lot like the very earmarks he would begrudge other members of Congress. In his quixotic quest, the good doctor even opposed such 'earmarks' as Congressional medals for luminaries including Pope John Paul II and Rosa Parks. Allegedly, the medals would have cost tax payers too much money.

Perhaps if the duo were from Galveston, TX Paul would have felt differently? After all, Paul seems to think any project from there is merely a tax credit.

Christmas Observations

A delayed post from my trip to OK:

Nothing captures the Christmas season quite so well as the terminal gate of an airport. Traveling prompts a variety of reactions for scores of people. Usually for me, they are calm ones. I attribute this to my religious adherence to the two hour rule. Regardless of the Homeland Security advisory I arrive at the airport two hours early. We could be coded at purple and I would yet arrive two hours early. I find this neuroticism typically mitigates any last minute changes or travel glitches on the rare occasion they do pop up.

Today, my habit and a delayed flight leave me with plenty of time to sit and contemplate the Christmas season. I find that when given the time, there is always something to see which merits a brief post of social commentary. This mass of humanity pressing toward the departure gate is no exception.

First, there is something sadistically Christmas about red-faced parents and screaming kids with roller skate shoes gliding down the aisles.

As a dispassionate observer of the human condition, perhaps it is enough to be impressed with the kids and their roller skate shoes. Their parents also have no shortage of pluck in permitting them to wear the contraptions en route to Grandma's. The security implications alone would likely deter me from even trying. It's interesting to note that the shoes also bespeak an underlying resiliency about kids in general. While it was unfortunate that the girl slipped and fell just now, it's important to keep in mind that she can buy a new ice cream and that the stain can be taken out of her clothes. It's a chance for parents to remind kids that sometimes in life you take a fall but you have to suck it up, like the father said, and get over it. After all, "you're the one who whined to get the shoes in the first place," as the mother notes.

Moreover, since it is Christmas, I must confess to a bit of cross-generational envy. True, I never walked twelve miles to school in the snow like my parents, but suffice it to say that our travel toys weren't nearly as cool. In terms of footwear, I can distinctly remember thinking that Nike Air Jordan’s would enable me to fly (they did--momentarily). But the mother of all Christmas wishes (shoe-wise) were the black Reebok Pumps. In practice, the shoe really didn't live up to its hype like most things in the early 90s (Remember the Clinton Presidency?). Here, the pump mechanism left something to be desired but when it did work, its effect was to make your feet feel something like a diabetic- a bit bloated with far too much pressure concentrated inside an otherwise comfortable shoe. To wit, as my sister and I learned the hard way that it was utterly possible to pump the shoes too much.

In all, the foregoing Christmas observations give me great hope. Mine is an obviously inferior generation to the talented kids of today (the one fall notwithstanding). My generation, "Y," had pump shoes and slap bracelets. The youth of today have roller-skate shoes and PSPs. The roller skate shoes alone are bound to give us a huge competitive edge over China in the long-term.

America is in good hands.

Song of the Week: Have Yourself A Merry Little Christmas

Written for the 1944 musical, Meet Me in St. Louis and performed by Judy Garland, the Pax Plena song of the week is nothing if not a classic.

Melding the romantic melancholy of Christmas with the soaring sounds of the season, "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas" has been a Holiday favorite performed by some of the biggest names in the business.

After consistent years of seasonal air-time, the song experienced a resurgence in the post-9/11 age when James Taylor recorded a modern version complete with darker lyrics. Taylor was by all accounts successful in capturing the somber mood of the Nation. The song was recently ranked #2 on the list of most played Christmas songs.

After giving it a further listen, the song can easily take the displaced and downcast alike back to fairer times. And so, as you think of happier days and pleasanter Christmas pasts (I certainly do) please enjoy the smooth saxophone of Kenny G and his instrumental version of "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas."







Have Yourself A Merry Little Christmas

Have yourself a merry little Christmas,
Let your heart be light
From now on,
our troubles will be out of sight

Have yourself a merry little Christmas,
Make the Yule-tide gay,
From now on,
our troubles will be miles away.

Here we are as in olden days,
Happy golden days of yore.
Faithful friends who are dear to us
Gather near to us once more.

Through the years
We all will be together,
If the Fates allow
Hang a shining star upon the highest bough.
And have yourself A merry little Christmas now.

Crying in Politics

The AP ran an interesting, albeit odd, story this past week about the new role crying has been permitted in the latest election cycle.

The long and short of the article?

Having a Muskie moment isn't necessarily a bad thing anymore.

[Link]

This should bode especially well for former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. He possesses the unique ability among the candidates to cry on cue.

Merry Christmas from Mike Huckabee

Newsweek's Stumper called it the smartest ad of the cycle. I couldn't agree more. It's always smart to focus on what really matters.

Ron Paul Supporters Waste $6 Million

On-line supporters of Libertarian candidate Ron Paul raised some $6 Million on-line yesterday, topping their previous best of $4.2 million a month ago.

[Link]

Paul's supporters could well have placed the $6 Million on a table and set fire to it. The Texas Congressman's campaign has been with met with scorn and hostility from most Republicans. He accordingly trails badly in every regional and National poll.

Sen. Joe Lieberman Backs McCain

I don't support his candidate in this primary, but Joe Lieberman's backing of a Republican once again proves why he's the smartest Democrat in the Senate.

[Link]

To wit, I would expect the Democrat leadership to be nothing but tolerant of Sen. Lieberman's pick. He is after all, the one vote difference in the their majority.

Gloves Come Off

It was only a matter of time with Mitt Romney plummeting in the polls that the barbs would really begin to fly. With only weeks to go before the Iowa Caucus, it appears this is the case.

[Link]

NJ Bans the Death Penalty

I spent Thanksgiving eve in Secaucus, NJ one year when my flight out of Newark was grounded due to snow.

[Link]

That one night in the Courtyard by Marriott makes me wonder, is banning the death penalty really a smart thing for New Jersey to do?

The Mitchell Report Round-up

The baseball steroids investigation wrapped up today with the release of the much-anticipated Mitchell Report. Or as the New York Yankees call it, the team memo.

[Link]

From Boston, only one member of the current Red Sox championship team made the blacklist, recently axed closer Eric Gagne. Interestingly, Gagne was an all around bust this post-season. One would guess with a multi-million dollar salary he would get his money's worth of the juice. Someone must have watered down the mix.

Meanwhile, some quarters have already begun to cry foul making only veiled platitudes toward parity in alleging that Roger Clemens has received special treatment over Barry Bonds throughout the ordeal (both were named in the Mitchell Report).

My own reaction is that it's a bit silly to raise the heckles when the the ink isn't even dry on the report, but make no mistake, Clemens should get what's coming to him just as Bonds deserves every bit of the sentence he gets once his perjury trial ends in conviction.

As for Clemens, his career was over anyway. The Rocket looked more like Sputnik this season. Now we all know why.

Snow Snarls Boston Traffic

It's a balmy 65 degrees here in Tucson.

On days like this, I don't miss New England or Boston one bit. According to the latest weather reports, snow was falling in Beantown at a rate of 1.5 inches per hour.

Apparently, the weather was all the worse just north of town along Interstate 93 near the suburbs of Waltham and Woburn.

"While today's storm will be the first significant snowfall of the season, it will be compact and fast moving," said Charlie Foley, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service. "Saturday night into Sunday will be more sprawling, much more like the classic northeaster."

[Link]

Saturday's forecast in Tucson, Sunny, 65 degrees.

Suckers.

Photo courtesy of Boston.com

Democrat Congress Dissolves Into Chaos

Interestingly, the Democrat led 110th Congress is a lot like Will Rogers said it would be:

I'm not apart of any organized political party. I'm a Democrat.

With Nancy Pelosi neurotically convinced Republicans 'like' war and the rest of the Dems bent on ignoring the shift of public opinion, certainly, no one has accused this Congress of being very organized.

Here's how the Washington Post described the madness:

Asked about his decision on government funding, House Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.) groused to the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call: "I'll tell you how soon I will make a decision when I know how soon the Senate sells us out." Senate Democrats have fired back, accusing Pelosi and her liberal allies of sending over legislation that they know cannot pass in the Senate, and of making demands that will not gain any GOP votes. Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) noted that, this summer, Reid employed just the kind of theatrics Rangel and other House Democrats are demanding, holding the Senate open all night, pulling out cots and forcing a dusk-till-dawn debate on an Iraq war withdrawal measure before a vote on war funding. Democrats gained not a single vote after the all-night antics.

"I understand the frustration; we're frustrated, too," Bayh said. "But holding a bunch of Kabuki theater doesn't get anything done."

...

Republicans, who spent 12 years in similar battles, are just enjoying the spectacle.

"Just let 'em stew for a while," said soon-to-retire Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-Miss.), a veteran of the GOP's own squabbles.

[Link]

Democrats swept into power a year ago with catchy slogans, cute turns of phrase and no vision for governance. To wit, their only legislative accomplishment has been a museum dedicated to hippie-Mecca, Woodstock.

Let 'em stew, indeed.

New Digs

As most of my readers know, I tend to change layouts more often than Mitt Romney changes policy positions.

However, after weeks of searching I am proud to say that Pax Plena finally has a semi-permanent new look. On the right appears all of the links, options, etc. that you have come to know and love. Or that I have come to know and love. I would guess most of you never use them.

Meanwhile, beneath each post, you will find the permalink, comments option and Email forward. The author's information (viz., reading list) now appears on the right-hand sidebar rather than at the top.

Hopefully the layout will be fairly intuitive if not aesthetically pleasing.

As always, if you have any questions just drop a line.

Song of the Week: White Christmas

The sun is shinning the grass is green. The cacti and palm trees sway...

Not exactly how the song goes. But the Tucson iteration of Beverly Hills & LA is pretty close and as frustrated ex-Northerners bemoan the lack of snow in warmer climes it becomes ever clear that Christmas is upon us.

With thoughts of home and snow fresh on the mind, the Pax Plena song of the week will be no stranger to the holiday musicphiles among us. Yet, the history of Irving Berlin's White Christmas may well be relegated to the dusty box of family ornaments and the ghosts of Christmas past. What follows is a brief primer on America's most popular Christmas song.

Interestingly, White Christmas actually has an Arizona connection which had previously escaped me. According to legend, Irving Berlin wrote the song poolside at the Arizona Biltmore Resort and Spa just up the road from here in Phoenix. As the song hit airwaves in 1942, America was well into a period of deep uncertainty. In November, of the same year the U.S. Navy suffered heavy losses in the Battle of Guadalcanal and gasoline rationing began as a result on the order's of President Franklin D. Roosevelt back home. Suffice it to say, the backdrop for the inaugural performance of White Christmas in the film Holiday Inn was anything but auspicious.

But there was something special about the song. Berlin's initial assessment of his work turned out to be quite prescient- it was indeed the best song he had ever written. White Christmas would strike uniquely at the core of the American psyche, bringing with it all the charm and romance of the Christmas season to a Nation in more perilous a position than ever it had been since its founding. Released (perhaps not serendipitously) during the height of World War II, the song became a smashing hit with the American Armed Forces stationed overseas. The lyrics easily bring images of hearth and home to mind some sixty-five years later. It is difficult to apprehend their effect on American servicemen stationed in North Africa and Guadalcanal as the song made its way over the Armed Forces Radio Network. Suffice it to say, its success was nigh instantaneous.

By all accounts, the most famous version of the song remains the original rendition done by Bing Crosby in 1942. Its release then was actually just prior to the Christmas season and the song would go on to spend some 11 weeks atop the charts. It would return to the top twice more becoming the sole song in American history to make #1 three different times. The Guinness Book of World Records honors its as the number one Christmas song of all time.

Notably, while the 1942 version of the song features (arguably) the grandfather of the crooner generation, it does not feature the initial stanza originally written by Irving Berlin in the early 1940s. Both on the recording and in the movie in which it was initially introduced to American audiences, Bing Crosby sings only the chorus and leaves out the initial stanza. To provide its full effect, the complete lyrics appear in below. Legend has it, the initial stanza was set to poke fun at displaced northerns living in SoCal, once again proving that it is never a bad thing to make fun of Californians.

Even so, whether home for you is Los Angelas, Boston or Walters, please enjoy the 1942 version of Bing Crosby's White Christmas courtesy of Songza.com.






White Christmas

The sun is shining
The grass is green
The orange and palm trees sway.
I've never seen such a day
In Beverly Hills LA.
But it's December the 24th
And I am longing to be up North.

I'm dreaming of a white Christmas
Just like the ones I used to know.
Where the treetops glisten,
And children listen
To hear sleigh bells in the snow.
I'm dreaming of a white Christmas
With every Christmas card I write.
May your days be merry and bright.
And may all your Christmases be white.

Bill Clinton: Hillary Was Always the One

Allegedly, the former President said this with a straight face. So reports the Associated Press.

[Link]

This could be true, except for Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones, et al...

Romney, the Mormon Speech and How Charles Krauthammer Got It Wrong

Let me say from the beginning, I have long considered myself a fan of Charles Krauthammer. I mostly appreciate his commentary as a member of Fox News' Beltway Boys. I even check out his columns with the National Review from time to time. But today's hit piece about Mitt Romney's Mormon speech leaves me a bit bewildered.

Earlier this week, I went so far as to defend Romney from some of my friends on the left. Chris Hitchens dismissed Romney's Mormon speech as "Holy Nonsense" along with the by-line, "Mitt Romney's windy, worthless speech." While I find it a bit odd that Mr. Hitchens would go out of his way to dismiss something nonsensical, it occurs to me that Hitchens is very much the ideologue parading as a voice of reason. Most of us have come to expect this from Hitchens and his ilk.

Krauthammer is a different story.

Charles normally presents an unabashedly realist perspective of conservative politics. Those of us on the right have come to expect a well-reasoned, dispassionate opinion from him. But in his latest NRO column, Krauthammer is far closer to Hitchens' shrill tenor than he is toward his usual self. Based on his fawning article of Mitt Romney, methinks Krauthammer has a horse in this race. And for the present, that horse seems to be losing.

Consider this excerpt from his latest column:

The appealing aspects of Huckabee’s politics and persona account for much of this. But part of his rise in Iowa is attributable to something rather less appealing: playing the religion card. The other major candidates — John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, and Fred Thompson — either never figured out how to use it or had the decency to refuse to deploy it.

Huckabee has exploited Romney’s Mormonism with an egregious subtlety. Huckabee is running a very effective ad in Iowa about religion. “Faith doesn’t just influence me,” he says on camera, “it really defines me.” The ad then hails him as a “Christian leader.”

Forget the implications of the idea that being a “Christian leader” is some special qualification for the presidency of a country whose Constitution (Article VI) explicitly rejects any religious test for office. Just imagine that Huckabee were running one-on-one in Iowa against Joe Lieberman. (It’s a thought experiment. Stay with me.) If he had run the same ad in those circumstances, it would have raised an outcry. The subtext — who’s the Christian in this race? — would have been too obvious to ignore, the appeal to bigotry too clear.

Well, Huckabee is running against Romney (the other GOP candidates are non-factors in Iowa) and he knows that many Christian conservatives, particularly those who have an affinity with Huckabee’s highly paraded evangelical Christianity, consider Romney’s faith a decidedly non-Christian cult.

[Link]

Krauthammer's point is obviously impassioned but it remains far from rational.

Interestingly, Krauthammer gets the context of the Huckabee ad mostly right. But his framing of the issue is off. Huckabee has not exploited Mitt Romney’s Mormonism. I would argue Huckabee hasn't exploited much of anything at all, but if he did, he exploited voter discontent with Romney's ephemeral policy positions.

This is where Krauthammer gets it wrong. Romney did not give the speech because of bigoted Evangelicals or because that irascible Mike Huckabee backed him into a theological corner. If anything, Huck has been pressed on his religious beliefs far more than Romney. Quite the contrary, Mitt gave the speech to thwart voters perceptions of him as a political opportunist.

Evangelical voters see clips like the one below and wonder where Mitt Romney really stands:



As the video makes clear, Romney has had more positions on social issues than Rudy Giuliani has had wives. I think it raises a number of fair questions. And for many Evangelicals and moderates, the fresh start offered by Mike Huckabee is simply more forthright and more appealing.

As for Krauthammer's point about subtleties, it's odd he goes to great pains to assail Huck while concurrently calling Evangelicals intolerant derelicts who would call Mormons a cult. Nothing subtle there.

As if insult were not enough, Krauthammer goes on to make the claim that "If he (Huckabee) had run the same ad in those circumstances (Huck v. Lieberman; his example, not mine), it would have raised an outcry. The subtext — who’s the Christian in this race? — would have been too obvious to ignore, the appeal to bigotry too clear."

But the other side of the coin is that Huckabee ran the Iowa ad precisely because Romney's faith is not an issue. Assuming it is asked at all, Krauthammer's question, 'who's the Christian in this race,' is asked because a baseline for belief has already been established. Otherwise, the question an obvious non sequitur and Krauthammer's diatribe is no more insightful than Ralph Wiggum.

Unfortunately for Mitt, the answer is determined on the merits of the record and shifty positions earn no points with the folks deciding in Cedar Rapids.

Slate on Fred Thompson's Campaign

Granted, it is Slate but the post excerpt below from Slate's campaign blog pretty much sums up Fred Thompson's candidacy:
When I heard Fred Thompson had been endorsed by right-to-life groups in Wisconsin and South Carolina, it was like hearing about an old high-school classmate. Oh yeah, Fred—how the hell is that guy?

Not so good, apparently.

[Link]

Huckabee Opens Big Lead in Iowa

Having once again been entrenched in a finals induced stupor, I nearly missed the latest polls out of Iowa.

Despite Mitt Romney's Mormon speech this week, Mike Huckabee still managed to open-up a 2-1 lead in the latest Newsweek Survey:
The ordained Southern Baptist minister now leads Romney by a two-to-one margin, 39 percent to 17 percent, among likely GOP caucus-goers..."You rarely see anything like [Huckabee's surge]," says Larry Hugick, who directed the polling for Princeton Survey Research Associates. Hugick added that the reason has as much to do with a leeriness of the other candidates among Republican voters as Huckabee's folksy success on the stump. "He's filling a vacuum," Hugick said. "Nobody on the Republican side was getting strong support."

[Link]
As I have often remarked, we have a long way to go until Iowa, but even the experts seem stunned by the wave of support Huckabee has amassed. Selfishly, I at least partially credit the Chuck Norris ad with the rise in Huck's popularity.

If only he would release one with Ric Flair. If Flair could bring along the rest of the Four Horsemen for the spot, I dare say the smackdown would be levied against Romney even more.

NBC Media Bias?

The left is fond of howling at Fox News for its alleged media bias. Today's story on NBC proves the other networks are no better.

[Link]

Happy Hanukkah

To my many Jewish readers and friends, the crush of finals has nearly blinded me to the start of Hanukkah this year. With one test down, I have seen the light.

A festival of them, in fact.

As you spin the dreidel fast and feast on latkes, here's hoping for a joy-filled season and that the dreidel doesn't land on Nun.

Most importantly, here's wishing you a lights out Hanukkah.

[Link]

Photo courtesy of BiblePlaces.com

Top of the Heap: Huckabee Tops Latest National Poll

It has to be a good day down in Little Rock for former Arkansas Governor and GOP front-runner Mike Huckabee. Perhaps it's a drop soon to call Huck the front-runner. It was, after all, only one Rasmussen tracking poll and it included only likely caucus goers.

Nevertheless, the numbers today have Huckabee out front of the GOP pack leading former Republican favorite Rudy Giuliani 20% - 17%- admittedly well within the margin of error. What the numbers do indicate, at the least, is that the field is beginning to winnow and Huck is on the rise. Meanwhile, some 17% of voters still remain undecided according to the LA Times.

[Link]

Meanwhile, the attacks against Huckabee have already begun to mount. Allegations of push-polling by Huckabee supporters have started to make their way 'round the internets. According to reports, push-polling has been conducted by Huckabee backers against Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani, and John McCain. Politico, described the nefarious exchanges:
For each target, the pattern was the same -- a recorded message using voice recognition technology asked the recipient if they would participate in the caucuses, considered themselves pro-life and thought marriage should be between a man and a woman.

Then the dirt came, right after those called were asked which candidate they were backing.

For all three, the calls were phrased in the same manner: "If you knew that..."

But different candidates were targeted with different attacks.

For Thompson it was his past lobbying for an abortion rights group, his support of McCain-Feingold and that McCain-Feingold had also been known as "McCain-Feingold-Thompson."

For Giuliani, it was that he's "pro-abortion," supports civil unions and that "his police chief and business partner has been indicted" on various charges.

And for McCain, it was about his support for campaign finance reform and opposition to a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.
Oddly, if the exchanges were accurate as reported, the calls seem little more than truth in advertising.

The record shows that Fred Thompson did, in fact, lobby for an abortion rights group, and it also shows that he was a staunch supporter of McCain-Feingold.

The record on Giuliani is similarly clear. He is unabashedly pro-abortion and pro-civil unions. And, indeed, his "police chief and business partner," Bernie Kerik, has been indicted- to the tune of some 14 counts. To wit, the call could well have asked voters if they knew the former New York Mayor dressed in drag on occasion and this too would have been true.

The points made about McCain were spot on as well.

Given the issues raised above, whence the outrage? Andrew Sullivan called it, "pretty rough for a nice guy," implying that Huckabee is being duplicitous- given Huck's commitment to a clean campaign and assuming the campaign is behind the calls. While I have my doubts about the Huckabee campaign's direct involvement, I would argue that even if the campaign were behind the push-polling there isn't necessarily the level of malevolence (say that fast three times) implied by Sullivan. Rival camps have been quick to dish the dirt on Huck. One might think that turnabout is fair play.

Perhaps for Huck's opponents, turnabout is harder to take when one is simply stating the facts.

Huckabee Gains on Giuliani

There are certainly worse ways Mike Huckabee could have started off the week.

But being plastered across Drudge Report and coming within three points of front-running Rudy Giuliani isn't among them.

[Link]

Update: Two items of related interest. It is any coincidence that with Huckabee's rise in the polls both Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson are getting a little worried? Thompson likes to boast he's running second in National polls. Looks like he needs to check the headlines a little closer...

Song of the Week: The Biggest Lie

A thousand apologies for those who have written to complain about the absence of songs of the week. Blame it on finals. As an act of obeisance, let me say that this week's song of the week will not disappoint.

I rarely buy songs on iTunes. Although with "one-click" shopping and Apple so willing to store my credit card information, one might wonder why not. Even so, when I heard the song which follows I was utterly haunted and compelled to make the purchase.

By all accounts, today's featured artist Elliott Smith was a troubled person. Born and raised across the U.S. but primarily hailing from Portland, Smith's life was shrouded in addiction and depression. In turn, his melancholic lyrics aptly reflect the tortured mind of a troubled soul. What makes his style of music so captivating is the clear high-tenor of Smith's voice coupled with an almost wispy style of delivery. If one listens late enough, Smith's singing can be mistaken for errant thoughts passing through the shadows of mind.

By way of introduction, some of you may recall Smith's music as featured in the Robin Williams' film Good Will Hunting. The Pax Plena song of the week is taken from Smith's self-titled, 1995 album- dubbed by critic Rob O'Connor as "one of the most understated and incredible albums to emerge from the indie-rock scene in the 1990s."

Please enjoy, Elliott Smith's The Biggest Lie.



The Biggest Lie

I'm waiting for the train
The subway that only goes one way
The stupid thing that will come to pull us apart
And make everybody late
You spent everything you had
Wanted everything to stop that bad
And now i'm a crushed credit card registered to smith
Not the name that you call me with
You turned white like a saint
I'm tired of dancing on a pot of gold flake paint
Oh we're so very precious, you and i
And everything that you do makes me want to die
Oh i just told the biggest lie
I just told the biggest lie
The biggest lie

Oklahoma Best Mizzou in Big XII Title Game

Hats off to the Oklahoma Sooners who clobbered Missouri in tonight's Big XII title game in San Antonio. The Sooners pulled away after a closer than expected first half to get the win 38-17.

The excerpt below pretty much sums up the Big XII season:
Until this season, Mizzou football was best known for being on the wrong side of bizarre plays in other team's championship seasons: Colorado's famous ''fifth'' down in 1990 and Nebraska's miracle kicked pass TD that saved the Cornhuskers' in '97.

A win over a traditional power to win the Big 12 title would have been a major step toward erasing that dubious distinction.

But the Sooners are known for winning championships and dominating the Big 12.

[Link]
On the bright side, Missouri will in all likelihood go to a top bowl game- probably the Cotton Bowl according to ABC Sports announcer Brent Musburger. With as tumultuous a season as it has been, a decent bowl game isn't a bad consolation for any team.

Finally, just because I have to say it: so much for Sports Illustrated's 35-31 prediction. Enjoy the crow, boys. I hear it tastes mighty good down in Dallas.

But I'm a forgiving person. Less the esteemed writers become disconsolate, they can always pop in the video of tonight's game and play the Brent Musburger Drinking game.
 

Pax Plena Copyright © 2011 -- Template created by O Pregador -- Powered by Blogger