The Real Conditions for an Israeli Cease-fire

The ink was barely dry on her legal pad before the media began to deny the possibility of a cease-fire.

U.S. Secretary of State Condi Rice expressed her optimism this morning that the conditions had been outlined for a cease-fire between Israel and Hezbollah. The terms called for strengthening the Lebanese government by providing training to prevent Hezbollah attacks, while bringing in international peacekeepers to mind the border between Israel and Lebanon. The Lebanese government would disarm Hezbollah and other countries would impose an embargo against delivering weapons to any group but the UN force and the Lebanese government.

[Link]

But by this afternoon, attention shifted to a speech given by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert who re-stated his terms for the cease-fire outlined by Rice: the return of the kidnapped Israeli soldier and the end of Hezbollah attacks.

[Link]

In a latent effort to undermine the diplomatic leg work done by Secretary Rice, the Washington Post declared that Olmert had out-right rejected any cease-fire she had brokered.

[Link]

But the truth is that Olmert’s position never changed. In this July 17th story from the AP below, Olmert said essentially the same thing he said today: free our troops, stop attacking us. This point makes the WP story suspect- Rice’s diplomacy is not undermined because Olmert rejected a cease-fire. Rather, it is dependent upon the willingness of Lebanon to disarm Hezbollah and the ability of the Israelis to dismantle the terrorist regime. In other words, the Rice approach is one which squares directly with the initial conditions set by Olmert six days after the fighting began.

[Link]

New Dartmouth Blog

Tuck School of Business Professor Robert Hansen recently joined the rapidly expanding community of Dartmouth bloggers.

[Link]

Hansen is a self-described Libertarian who identifies with the Republican Party. His views on global warming and the related movie by Al Gore make for an interesting read.

[Link]

I also enjoyed his thoughts on the Israeli conflict with Hezbollah.

[Link]

Hat tip to Joe for welcoming the latest Dartmouth blogger.

[Link]

Left-wing Mexican Supporters Block Mexico City

Disgruntled supporters of left-wing, Presidential Candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador have opted to block all traffic in Mexican City to protest the Mexican democratic process.

[Link]

The protestors were urged by the failed candidate to grind business to a halt in Mexico City until every vote in the recent election was recounted. Obrador's opponent, Felipe Calderon (a conservative) won the Presidency on July 2nd with a narrow 0.2% victory. EU monitors have found no signs of foul play. The Mexican Supreme Court is set to rule on a recount by the end of August.

What better way for leftists to exercise their political voice than to hurt their Nation and its economy?

UN Slams US on Human Rights

In the midst of a brewing crisis, the ever attentive United Nations took the time to once again verbally bash the United States.

[Link]

The UN Commission on Human rights criticized the US on everything from its treatment of prisoners to its use of execution in capital murder cases. The commission came down particularly hard on the US’s lack of protection for the rights of the poor. That's Euro-speak for our lack of a socialist healthcare system.

But as with all things, its important to consider the source. In the case, the critique came from such human rights bastions as Egypt, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Ethiopia and the Congo who serve on the commission.

Foolishness like this demonstrates just why we need a strong Ambassador like John Bolton to stand up to the UN oligarchy. Below is his endorsement by the Boston Herald.

[Link]

For the record, the United States is annually the world’s largest donor of humanitarian aid. Not a bad showing for a country that doesn’t care about human rights.

[Link]

Progress Made on Mid East Crisis

Lots of news out on the Middle East. Most recently, Al Qaeda declared jihad against Israel only a few days after Newt Gingrich declared World War III. Just goes to show, you can’t one up Newt.
[Al Qaeda Link]

[Gingrich Link]

Meanwhile, responsibility for the actual violence has been blamed on everyone from Bush and Rice to Iran and Syria.

[Bush Link]

[Rice Link]

[Iran Link]

[Syria Link]

Conspicuously absent, however, from the list of blame is Hezbollah who has clearly bit off far more than it could chew.

[Hezbollah Link]

But the news out of today’s Washington summit on the crisis is that the US and Britain have agreed to support an international force being dispatched to the region aimed at dealing with the Hezbollah threat. The force is not likely to include American troops and will consist primarily of manpower from Europe. The US has resisted calls by European and Arab Nations for an immediate ceasefire for want of a longer-term solution to the crisis. You know, actually solve the problem rather than put it off. But today’s talks indicate that Blair has more sway in Washington than people give him credit for having.

[Link]

The multinational force is a step in the right direction. It’s a good compromise on the part of the US while sticking to the main objective- eliminating terrorist threats in the region. In then end, there remain but two course for dealing with Hezbollah. Eliminate the threat or seek to appease it. Pacifists in Europe and on the American far left have always stressed appeasement couched in the language of diplomacy, engagement and talks. But in a post-9/11 world those ideas are long dead. To deny a threat’s existence is tantamount to the ostrich burying his head in the sand.

The time to act is now and the British compromise is a good first step.

BBC Takes on Human Rights Abuse in Iran


For anyone in doubt about the vileness of the Iranian regime, look no further than the link below.

[Link]

This is the essence of the war on terror and why America must never retreat into the easy path of isolation.

Al Qaeda Launches Jihad Against Israel

It’s good to know that Al Qaeda is an equal opportunity terror organization- all the ones best are.

[Link]

In the wake of Israel’s campaign against Hezbollah, Al Qaeda released a video by its #2 leader declaring jihad against the Jewish state.

This takes the total number of states Al Qaeda has declared jihad against up to three: Israel, the US and Britain. No word on whether the new Al Qaeda recruits will complain about being over extended.

N'SYNC's Lance Bass: I'm Gay

According the the CNN entertainment section, former N'SYNC star Lance Bass has announced that he is gay.

[Link]

Then again, wasn't the whole band?

Iran Angered at Airspace "Block"

Rumor has it that Iran is angry at fellow Arab states Turkey and Saudi Arabia for having blocked Iran from using their airspace to send "aid" to Lebanon.

[Link]

It's about time our allies in the region step up. After all, this is the same Iran whose parliament called for Arabs in both countries to rise up against their governments. Perhaps this is the start of a Saudi awakening to the Iranian threat?

[Link]

At any rate, as you can see from the map at right, their refusal to allow transport to the Iranian government puts Iran at a strategic disadvantage. There's no way anything will get across Iraq with the US presence in the country. Saudi Arabia and Turkey are the next most direct routes.

Given the refusal, for anything to get to Lebanon from Iran, it must now go through Dubai (located within the orange country adjacent to Saudi Arabia) and then around Saudi Arabia to Syria.

*Map courtesy of Theodora.com.

Zogby: No Big Shift Before 2006 Mid-Term Elections

My trusty Congressional Quarterly update had an interesting news addendum regarding the 2006 Mid-terms. Zogby Polling is essentially saying that there isn’t a sweeping mandate for new Congressional leadership. Translation: don’t look for the Dems to take control of Congress.

Here is the brief in its entirety from CQ:

Zogby Interactive Polling reports, “The 2006 mid-term election battle has fallen into a virtual stalemate, with few challengers making headway against incumbents who seem to be digging in for defensive campaigns around the country. ... The latest round of Internet-based surveying by pollster John Zogby finds Democratic Senate challengers in strong field position against two weakened Republican incumbents,” Rick Santorum, Pa., and Mike DeWine, Ohio, but “few signs of a Democratic sweep. Pollster John Zogby said, “I just don’t see any tectonic shifts in the country at large, which is not to say it can’t happen. It’s just not happening now.”

Love in the Digital Age

Many things have changed with the advent of the information age. Perhaps none more striking than our ability to communicate with rapidity. Unfortunately for Joseph Dobbie, he learned this one the hard way.

[Link]

After attending a party, Dobbie was struck by a woman he met during the evening. Not an uncommon occurrence. In turn, he proceeded to send her a long, sniveling, embarrassing e-mail, replete with poetic voice, declaring his love for her. See the text of his letter here. But just wait it gets better.

[Link]

Rather than capturing the affections of his would-be lover, the girl blew him off and forwarded the e-mail to her sister. The rest, as they say, is history. That e-mail is now circulating the globe, filling up in-boxes and capturing the attention of bloggers and tabloids all over the web.

The irony of the situation is found in the closing strains of his now infamous missive: Either way, I trust that your reply will be candid - you told me how much you value honesty. One last thing, I promise that it is enormously rare for me to stray as far from sobriety as I managed on Saturday night. Be safe. Joe.

Poor guy. Just goes to show you can’t really trust anybody- in this case, even yourself.

The Hill 50 Most Beautiful People

The Hill newspaper released its list of the 50 most beautiful people on Capitol Hill this morning.

[Link]

Of the top five, four were Republicans proving once again that Republicans are better looking than Democrats.

Though I would make the rare exception for Rep. Stephanie Herseth (D-SD).

[Link]

Snow Apologizes for Stem Cell Comments

I'm not sure I agree with Tony Snow's retraction but I think his apology is one of the key reasons he's among the most popular figures in Washington right now.

After describing the President's view of stem cell research as murder on Friday, Snow remarked yesterday afternoon, I overstepped my brief there, and so I created a little trouble for Josh Bolten in the interview. And I feel bad about it.

[Link]

It's amazing how an issue can die when someone admits a mistake.

If you're waiting for Kerry to apologize for his comments, don't hold your breath- much to all conservative delight.

Kerry Blames Mideast Crisis on Bush

Displaying exactly why he lost his Presidential race in 2004, John Kerry took sore loser to a new level. According to the Detroit News, Kerry was on a campaign swing with MI Governor Jennifer Granholm, when he said of the Mideast conflict, If I was president, this wouldn't have happened.

[Link]

Exactly, John.

If you were President no terrorist organization would threaten a state they hate; hate would not exist. Moreover, thousands of years of animosity would be instantly overcome and no extremist regimes like Syria and Iran would incite terrorists to violence.

And hell might even be frozen over.

Landis Wins Tour de France

I wasn't sure he could do it. I was a doubter.

After bragging two days ago that he would win it all, Floyd Landis fell back to 11th place.

Today, however, the bragging paid off as Landis became only the third American in history to win the Tour de France.

I stand corrected. Job well done.

[Link]

Straw Poll Results

I wish I had a fancy script that would show the results from the straw poll over the weekend like I did for the poll itself. But no such luck.

[Link]

My brief run down will have to do. Here are the top and bottom two finishers:

Normally, bloggers on the left tend to be a bit out of the mainstream within their party, but in terms of tapping the conservative pulse, GOP Bloggers tended to represent a good range of GOP opinion.

First Place: True to form, as with other straw polls, Sen. George Allen of VA continues to do well. He garnered the largest positive rating among the 11 potential candidates listed. Allen received a 69.2% favorable rating to a lower, but not insignificant 18.3% unfavorable rating.

Second Place: Newt Gingrich checked in with a respectable 63.3% favorable rating compared to a 27.9% unfavorable rank. Gingrich raised his profile considerably in the week before the poll was conducted by declaring the Israeli-Hezbollah conflict the start of WWIII.

Second to last: Much to my surprise, Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska all but tanked in his showing. Hagel came in with a 70.2% unfavorable rating compared with just 10.6% who viewed him favorably. The results are a surprise because Hagel initially did very well early last year in battle ground states like Iowa and particularly in NH where the voting block trends moderate/slightly right of center. In turn, Hagel consistently bucks the President on intelligence issues most recently coming out against the Administration’s domestic terrorist surveillance program which may have been his recent undoing.

Last Place: In dead last, NY Governor George Pataki showed that he still has a long way to go toward making in roads with the GOP faithful. Pataki finished slightly behind Hagel in his unfavorable ranking, clocking in at 71.5% to a 12.2% positive rating.

GOP Bloggers Straw Poll

The GOP Bloggers of which yours truly is a member has decided to run a straw poll of its blogs and those who love them.

If you're so inclined feel free to submit your results for the tally. Even if you are a "lefty troll" (Democrat) as the poll calls you, by all means submit your thoughts on the 2008 GOP Presidential nominee.


Stem Cell Fiasco

One day after President Bush exercised his first veto while in office, the BBC soundly scorned the decision as being 'out of touch.'

[Link]

Given the hostility this issue engenders as seen above, I was pleased to read a post by Joe Malchow which unpacks the issue in a useful way and places the decision squarely within its proper context: federal spending.

[Link]

Adding to what Joe has said, I would take the argument a bit further and say that the basic question being decided by the President was whether each individual should be forced to pay for research which no small segment of the population found objectionable. Of course, the left was quick to sound the alarms as NY Sen. Chuck Schumer opted to castigate that portion of the population as theocrats rather than concede the validity of their interest. Then again, when is the last time Schumer said anything helpful.

[Link]

This aside, the issue really was one of funding. As America moves toward new medical technologies which seem to have great promise we will also confront great questions regarding their ethical implications. Setting a moderate course now and opting to federally fund the research with restrictions follows a basic conservative principle of government restraint by opening the doors for privately funded research which will continue unabated.

The real battle will come when the technology develops and government gets into the business of setting regulations in light of ethical boundaries. For now, however, the issue is one of dollars which neither hinders nor helps the many private foundations that are interested in seeing such research carried out.

Obama Warns Blacks Against Bush

We hear a lot these days about the need for racial equity and the need for Republicans, specifically, to reach out to voters of color to borrow a phrase from liberal parlance. But the destructive comments made recently by the Junior Senator from Illinois only underscore why that conversation is increasingly difficult to have.

[Link]

In remarks made before the President's address to the NAACP, IL Senator Barack Obama warned the black organization against trusting the President. Obama said of Bush's speech, "Don't be bamboozled. Don't buy into it."

In other words, only trust the Democrats- we're your friends!

To all black Americans Obama's message is patronizing at best and demeaning at worst. He speaks as if the black community possess no ability to think on its own about the issues. Contrary to his belief, the NAACP and its members are more than capable of evaluating the finer points of policy. They are more than able to understand which party has delivered more over the past ten years. This point, however, is the exact reason Democrats are up in arms to inflame racial tension.

If blacks were no longer beholden to one party, if they really listen to the President and consider GOP policies in earnest, then the Democrats would effectively lose their largest, most reliable coalition in a party made up entirely of coalitions and no vision.

For the past five years, Democrats have been excoriating Bush for not meeting with the organization. By refusing to attend the President was racially divisive. Now that he is attending, the Democrats say, "well, he's going but you shouldn't trust him." However, it is worth mentioning that it was John Kerry who urged black Americans to vote against his re-election in 2004, NAACP Chairman Julian Bond who called for the President's removal from office and who criticized his cabinet appointments as being from "the Taliban wing of American politics."

[Link]

Of course, what the President actually did was appoint the first black Secretary of State, followed by the first hispanic Attorney General and the first black female Secretary of State, all while expanding funding for minority entrepreneurship, raising education expectations for minority communities and providing the means for churches in inner city neighborhoods to address the needs of their communities.

[Entrepreneurship Link]

[Education Link]

[FBCI Link]

What have the Democrats done for the black community in recent years besides take their vote for granted? Yet, it's the GOP that needs to reach out to black voters? The crux of Bush's speech should be to explain the disconnect and show that the liberal message of lower standards for minorities is unacceptable.

Lessons from Death Row

I'm normally a staunch supporter of capital punishment. I absolutely believe that the state has a vested interest in serving ultimate justice when another's life has been taken by another. As a corollary, I would also hasten to add that while the death penalty should remain a viable punishment for crimes of murder, it should be administered only after careful deliberation and a thorough examination of the facts.

Increasingly, DNA analysis has become a useful tool for both vindicating and condemning convicted murders. After reading the case of Mauriceo Brown who is scheduled to die in Texas at 6pm this evening, I can't help but wonder why this tool is not more widely used- particularly in cases during which the technology did not exist. Brown's case went to trial in 1995. As a society, we should never reach the point where we are more eager to execute criminals than we are to determine with certainty their guilt. I will concede the point that many of the accused requesting the analysis stand to have their convictions re-affirmed as was the case in VA a few months ago. But for those innocent few who stand convicted our efforts to determine their guilt is worth the test.

Unfortunately, for Mauriceo Brown this opportunity is being denied. Brown's appellate lawyer requested that the Judge allow DNA testing to be performed on the clothing of four additional suspects in the car the night the murder took place. The assumption is that the victim's blood would not have splattered on Brown's clothing because he was inside the car when the murder took place. Rather, it would have splattered on the actual gunman thus vindicating his client. The Judge, of course, promptly denied the attorney's request last Friday. Brown will be executed tonight barring intervention from one of his appeals.

[Link]

What made the story go beyond the norm was an interview given by Brown to Court TV News. The interview is spread out over several pages but reads fairly quickly. It delves into the life of a death row inmate and explores what happened on the night in which the murder took place. It also explains Brown's side of the circumstances which led to his conviction and is actually quite convincing given the context of his background and point in life at the time.

[Link]

More to the point, however, is that Brown has developed a profound perspective on life- perhaps as only starring at death each day can provide. But from the walls of his cell, Brown's inner peace provides an example worthy of emulation and a lesson for all to learn: Life is precious regardless of its form. The lessons I have taken from death row in this instance is that often times the state is over eager to execute. The lesson of Mauriceo Brown is that all the same we are in some way 'born to die' and our time here is a gift no matter when it ends.

Update: Mauriceo Brown was executed yesterday evening at 6:47pm.

[Link]

Rich Tarrant Invites Himself to McCain Event

The Senate election brewing in the State of Vermont has garnered little press attention in recent months- in large part due to the popularity of Socialist incumbent Representative Bernie Sanders. So, imagine my surprise to read about the race plastered in the headlines of the Boston Globe and in my Congressional Quarterly update earlier this afternoon.

[Link]

Unfortunately, for VT Republicans the news wasn't good. The story was about an embarrassing blunder made by the campaign of GOP candidate Rich Tarrant who attempted to crash an event held in honor of fellow Republican Martha Rainville.

Rainville, who actually is a viable candidate to replace Sanders in the House, managed to snag a prime appearance with US Senator John McCain- a darling of the moderate Republicans who make up the bulk of the VT Republican Party.

The faux pas came when Tarrant's campaign sent out a series of press releases to supporters heralding their candidate's appearance with the Senator. One problem. The campaign notified neither Rainville nor McCain.

In response, McCain's strategist Michael Dennehy issued this terse reply:

I know that (McCain) wouldn't be in favor of it. He's coming to Vermont to campaign for Martha Rainville. It's terribly confusing as to why the Tarrant campaign would suggest otherwise.

In short, candidate though he may be, Rich Tarrant didn't make the invite list. For Tarrant, it must have been eerily reminiscent of his time in college.

*Photo courtesy of the VT Guardian.

GE CEO Bounces Check

The NYT had an interesting article about the financial woes of some of the Nation's wealthiest people. Don't worry. Your local, Fortune 500 CEO isn't going underwater anytime soon. But sometimes they just can't keep track of all that dough.

[Link]

GE CEO and Dartmouth '78 Jeff Immelt found this out the hard way. Immelt earns some $15.4 million a year and owns $190 million in GE stock but bounced a check to the campaign of NY Republican Gubernatorial candidate Bill Weld. Turns out, the account from which the check had come was closed.

Oops.

To those familiar with the College, Immelt most recently made news as the 2004 Commencement Speaker.

[Link]

To the fine folks at GE: if Mr. Immelt wants help with the books from a fellow Son of Dartmouth, just have him give me a call.

PS: If he's inclined to pay off some student loans, also have him see me.

*Neglected to mention- dollar sign courtesy of Merlin's Tower.

Mideast Fighting to Last for Weeks

For anyone weary of the battle between Israel and Hezbollah, don't look for it to end any time soon.

According to the lead Israeli General on the ground, the fighting in the Mideast is set to last weeks. Violence could even be seen to escalate as ground troops have also not been ruled out.

[Link]

I haven't commented much the past couple of days on this brewing crisis. But rest assured a much longer post is in the works, replete with a critique of Newt Gingrich's WWIII.

[Link]

[Link]

More to come...

Global Company Arrives in OK

I had intended to make a comment on the above news items a few days ago but time slipped away. Nonetheless, the NYT reported about a week ago that the Chinese, Nanjing Automobile Group plans to re-launch the MG Marque series. And they’re going to do it right from the middle of the United States in the State of Oklahoma.

[Link]

Nanjing purchased the bankrupt MG Rover Group last year in effort to expand its customer base to new, global markets. In its expansion, Nanjing hopes to become the first Chinese automaker to break ground in the United States. The company is looking to build revamped models of the MG TF Coupe seen above upon completion of its facilities in 2008. The coupe would be set to compete with the Mazda Miata selling between 20 and 25K.

By way of history, the MG brand was legendary in the 1920s when William Morris of the Morris Garage first churned out the everyman's sportscar. The idea was to make it the most affordable yet fun car on the market. Formerly based in London, the MG brand represents the earliest indications of the global economy which would follow. That the Nanjing Automobile Group purchased the British company only set up shop in OK demonstrates that globalization has expanded even to the most unlikely of places.

Ardmore OK stands to gain some 500 jobs from a Chinese company as a result. For a community of some 20,000 people, it will provide no small boost to the local economy.

Real Men Do Yoga

Some of you know that I joined a health club recently. During my lunch hour, spare Tuesdays and Thursdays, I make my way from the 10th to the 2nd floor in my building where the facilities are located. Since my firm subsidizes part of the cost, the only reason for me not to go is sheer laziness.

When I go there is a room almost always filled with people contorting their bodies in an ungodly manner. Sometimes I swear I can hear the distinct sound of chanting in the background, but maybe it’s just me. In general, the room is routinely 99.9% female and for the guy or two who happens to participate I can’t help but judge him as being a bit effeminate.

Turns out I may have it all wrong. A recent AP article seems to indicate that perhaps only real men do yoga.

[Link]

The latest subset of the population to hit the yoga craze increasingly consists of members of the United States Marine Corp. Fresh off of operations in Iraq, US Marines have begun to turn to yoga for help in maintaining “a sense of inner calm” during missions; developing better posture while flying; eliminating stiffness after injury; controlling breathing while diving; and learning to remain in unusual positions for extended periods of time.

I have to admit, I never really considered that doing yoga had any benefit. But if it works for these Marines hey, who am I to judge? Who knows, maybe I’ll think twice now before I laugh at the guy in the yoga class?

Probably not.

Bush Curses Hezbollah

The headlines on most of the news wires this morning alluded to some choice words President Bush had for the Hezbollah terrorist regime.

[Link]

During a private dinner with other leaders of the G-8, President Bush turned to British PM Tony Blair and said: "What they need to do is to get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this shit." In this instance, however, the mics were still rolling and his candid remarks went out to news outlets across the world.

First of all, I agree with the President’s assessment almost down to his coarse description. Hezbollah’s actions are what they are. Why not call a spade a spade as the President did?

But the bigger issue with me on the matter is why the press made such a big deal out of it. Let’s consider the context here: we have a major confrontation brewing between the Israelis and Hezbollah, there are far more problems than solutions at this point and all the media cares to point out on the matter is that the President of the United States said a curse word. Let alone the fact that it was probably the same curse word the reporters said when they missed their filing deadlines a thousand times over.

So, Bush cursed Hezbollah. I do too.

World’s Most Powerful Twins

I have to admit, this story made me laugh more than a bit when I first read it. I think it's probably the greatest tale of nepotism ever told. The mighty Nation of Poland recently became the first country in the modern world to be led by identical twins.

[Link]

Polish President Lech Kaczynski appointed his twin brother Jaroslaw Kaczynski as Prime Minister who was sworn into office earlier this morning. Jaroslaw becomes PM after a political rift forced his brother’s initial PM designate to resign.

The rumors on the internets report that the brothers enjoy playing pranks on the media and often dress identically at press conferences to confuse reporters and citizens alike. It seems that sometimes Mom’s habits die hard.

It’s also interesting to note that their names do not really bespeak political leadership. When I think of Lech and Jaroslaw Kaczynski, I think more of two brothers owing a plumbing business in New York than as the President and PM of Poland. Perhaps Mario and Luigi will one day seek office in Italy?

GOP Set to Lose in November?

Beating a horse which long ago died, the AP released a poll today claiming that most voters are disaffected with Republican control of Congress and that Republicans were set to lose in November.

[Link]

The subtext of the poll is that it was a National poll taken from disparate places across the US, while control of the House will be decided on a local, district by district basis. Democrats have not so far been successful in creating a National campaign against Republicans and most people tend to support their incumbent representatives. The GOP also retains a consistent edge in foreign policy and fighting terrorism.

Another point of order is that the sample size of the poll consisted only of 789 registered voters- a much smaller number than the sample size of 1,000 typically recommended by social scientists.

Sounds like the AP has a horse in this race.

Up-date: G-8 Split Over Israeli Strikes

The headlines read Bush backs Israel but perhaps the bigger headline is that the Israeli attacks have highlighted existing rifts within the G-8 on a number of contentious issues in advance of their annual powwow in Russia later this week.

[Link]

Both the US and Germany have affirmed Israel’s right to self-defense while urging caution in potentially ‘toppling’ a tenuous Lebanese government. Meanwhile, Russia and France have announced their ubiquitous opposition to any use of force.

Perhaps showing signs of domestic strain from its commitment to Iraq, the UK has neither condemned nor affirmed the attacks. Rather, Prime Minister Tony Blair’s government has opted to condemn the kidnapping of Israeli troops by Hezbollah and urges their speedy return. Would that it were so easy.

This of course leaves Canada, Italy and Japan on the fence. With Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper calling the shots in Canada and Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi fresh off his trip to Graceland, one might reasonably infer that they would support the American-German position. Given Italy’s newly elected, leftist Prime Minister Romano Prodi it is also reasonable to expect Italy to support the Franco-Russian position without much debate.

What makes the fracture interesting is that it mirrors these countries and their respective position on Iraqi reconstruction, on North Korean sanctions and on negotiations with Iran. Given the conflux of world events, it becomes clear that we are seeing a classic case of new realignments within the geo-political process which make this week’s meeting in St. Petersburg even more intriguing to watch.

I hate to take a cynical view, but I wouldn’t look for too much to come out of the meetings. But what will be interesting to observe is how these Nations entrench their positions and to see if they can persuade the Russians to give ground on any meaningful solutions to the many pressing international relations issues facing the world today- but like I said, don’t hold your breath.

Up-date: Kateland_62 over at The Last Amazon called to my attention that Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has, in fact, come down firmly on the side of Israel. It's a gutsy move by the new PM and one surely welcomed in advance of the G-8 summit on Sunday.

[Link]

More on Raytheon's THADD Missile Test

It's a day late but the Drudge Report is finally picking up on Raytheon's missile defense test. He describes yesterday's test intercept as phenomenal. By all accounts, it was indeed that. [Link]

Check out the article Drudge links to in the Las Cruces Sun-News. [Link]

Just remember, you heard it here first! [Link]

American Leads Tour de France

With Lance Armstrong out, the Tour de France has received less media attention than a Tom Daschel press conference. Nevertheless, it's worth mentioning that our standards have not abated since the departure of Lance.

American Floyd Landis took over first place Thursday after having competed well in the Pyrenees Mountains- the hardest stage of the race. I'm not sure how long he can keep it up but he's doing a great job and it's always nice to beat French.

There's something very Mayberry about it but go Floyd!

[Link]

Big Progress Made on Missile Defense

The news didn't capture headlines but significant progress was made today in the effort to secure American troops from attacks by latent missiles in the wee hours of the morning.

Out in rural New Mexico, residents became alarmed and alerted authorities to unidentified flashes of light and large explosions in the desert. The reports came in from as far away as El Paso, TX. What the locals actually saw was a live ballistic missile test, replete with radar tracking, intercept and a satisfying bang.

[Link]

Later this afternoon, the Raytheon company announced the successful test of its THAAD radar (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) which achieved all test objectives- tracking the target, discriminating between the live missile and other objects and communicating location data to the THAAD missile interceptor which obliterated its target with ease.

[Link]

The project in general is designed to provide tracking and missile defense capabilities to troop units stationed in the field- an increasingly useful tool should we need to defend locations in Japan against missile strikes from North Korea. At any rate, the success indicates marked progress in America's missile defense capabilities and in the military's hopes for an integrated, operable missile defense system. It didn't make headlines, but it should have.

Bush's Poll Numbers on the Rise

Conspicuously absent from the mainstream media was any word on the latest CNN/Gallup poll. A few weeks ago when the President was hovering around 30%, the polls graced the front page of every major news daily in the country.

Now that the President has rebounded to a much healthier 40% and the GOP base is starting to circle the wagons, as it were, Bush's poll numbers are nowhere to be found. Except for on the Gallup site.

[Link]

The National Review offers a brief but important summary of the latest polling trend.
[Link]

Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard adds an interesting analysis of the Bush bounce in the publication's latest issue.
[Link]

Hat tip to Joe over at Dartblog for calling the numbers to my attention.
[Link]

Facebook Gets Political

Rumor on the street is that the popular college networking site, Facebook, is offering to sell profiles to politicians.

[link]

The idea is that selling the profiles will allow politically inclined students to connect with their favorite candidates in show of support on the web.

One word can summarize my thoughts on this: lame.

But not quite as lame as the Lamont ad run against Joe Lieberman.

[link]

These are signs of the times. American political thought degenerates more and more each day.

More on Big Dig Collapse

More news coming out on the Big Dig collapse. The Boston Globe ran the following headline this morning: Workmanship and design of tunnel are called into question.

[link]

The Globe got it right, but isn't this obvious? When a 12 ton concrete slab falls on a car, it's just common sense to call into question the workmanship and design of the project. The article isn't really telling us anything new- just confirming what most people already suspect. Not exactly stellar reporting.

Also in the Globe this morning was a much more informative article on the couple riding in the car. It shows pictures from their wedding and features an interview from the husband who survived. It does a good job of contextualizing the tragedy from the family's perspective and highlights why the State needs to take swift action to secure the tunnels.

[link]

In all, I think Gov. Romney said it best- heads need to roll. The State owes this family solutions so this never happens again. It's time the MTA care more about our citizens driving on and within its projects than about shielding themselves from responsibility.

[link]

Iran Responds to Nuclear Incentives

Responding to a package of incentives offered by the EU and US, Iran's much awaited response was we need a long process of consultation.

Subscript: just long enough so that we can build a real weapon.

More: National Review on Cowboy Diplomacy and Darfur

A couple of National Review writers add an interesting addendum to my post yesterday on the death of cowboy diplomacy.

[link]

Writers Joseph Loconte & Nile Gardiner call out the liberal establishment for their hypocrisy in demanding an end to the Bush Doctrine while railing against the absence of unilateral force in Sudan. This hypocrisy does not to diminish the dire situation in Sudan. Even President Bush has gone so far as to call the crisis genocide. But it underscores the tension in calling for an end to the use of preemptive attack when faced with a UN that accomplishes nothing while people suffer.

Here is the money quote: This is the corrosive logic of a political dogma: an almost religious devotion to a U.N. solution to human-rights abuses, despite the institution’s repeated and spectacular failures. Under this doctrine, the Security Council alone retains credibility to confront genocidal regimes. The 15-nation body—a gaggle of dictatorships, theocracies, and democracies—is somehow expected to disown powerful economic and political interests to defend society’s weakest members.

China: World Overreacting on North Korea

The news on the wire is that China is refusing to support the majority position on the UN Security Council, calling the Japanese resolution to impose sanctions on North Korea an overreaction.

The Chinese make the argument that the resolution will only intensify the conflict, upsetting stability in the region.

It's not surprising really but the Chinese miss the point. North Korea has already upset stability in the region. Of course, when you consider that China is North Korea's strongest ally and trade partner, it becomes clear that the Chinese have no real interest in helping the rest of the world solve this problem.

Boston's Big Dig Collapses

A three-ton concrete slab fell on top of a car Monday night killing one female passenger and injuring another.

The collapse happened inside the Big Dig- better known as Boston's $14 billion nightmare. The tunnel in which the collapse happened is a main route through the city. It buries Interstate 93 underneath the city and provides access to Logan Airport from the Mass Turnpike.

The State of Massachusetts is already under fire for its handling of the project. This tragedy is sure to make critics of the program even more uneasy with its implementation and make Bostonians think twice before taking 93 through the city. Aside from this collapse, the tunnel has been found to be rife with leaks. Six people are being charged with using faulty concrete in the early phase of its construction.

[link]

Ironically, the accident occurred near the newest section of the Big Dig some 200 feet from the end near the entrance to the Ted Williams Tunnel which connects to Logan airport. I've ridden that particular stretch many a time. I think I'll take the subway from now on.

The Bush Doctrine, Japan, and the Future of the War on Terror

To say these are uncertain times is to call Babe Ruth an okay baseball player. Today alone the New York Daily News has declared World War III [link], North Korea has vowed to press ahead with ballistic missile testing [link], Japan is considering a preemptive strike in retaliation [link], Time Magazine has declared a new foreign policy doctrine for the United States [link] and it looks like Tom Delay may run for re-election after all [link]. Delay’s election chances notwithstanding, at the core of this debate, at least partially, is the role of the Bush Doctrine in shaping post-9/11 foreign policy.

In its article, Time Magazine pronounced the Bush Doctrine dead. Its cover offered the specter of a cowboy covered by ten-gallon hat, mourning “Cowboy Diplomacy.” Its message was that the doctrine itself had been all hat and no cattle. But like every oversimplification the matter has already come back to haunt. In a twist of irony, the magazine was forced to make an addendum to the Bush Doctrine piece as they linked directly beneath it to the story about Japan’s debate regarding preemptive attack.

Ideas never completely die. They may evolve, take new forms and be presented in different ways, but they are never totally gone.

In some respects, Time’s concurrent and contradictory stories are typical of the period in which we live. We live in an age of existential crisis where our reality is as fast and fleeting as the daily headlines. Time makes this point though, perhaps, unwittingly: even as Time denies the existence of the Bush Doctrine, its story on Japan re-affirms its existence.

The doctrine itself is nothing now. The truth is that preemptive action far pre-dates the Bush Administration. Even the National Security Strategy often cited as the framework for the policy concedes the United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to our national security [link]. But what makes the Bush approach different is that he has simply been among the first American leaders to engage in preemptive attack with any degree of success (preemptive action was also attempted during the Bay of Pigs though with markedly different results than Iraq and Afghanistan). Seeing progress made in the war on terror, in both the Iraqi and Afghan theaters, free people understand that there is little merit to negotiating with terrorists and hoping for the best. Japan’s seismic message to the world is that threats from tyrants are unacceptable. And increasingly, there are those on the American left who are inclined to agree [link]. Far from being dead then, it would seem that the Bush Doctrine is very much alive for those countries who defend freedom’s cause.

Interestingly, my point is also true of ideas from the opposite perspective. Tyrants rise and fall; they take new forms but their motivations are the same classic tensions underscored in the annals of history. We may be tempted to write off Kim Jong-Il as a maniacal and indeed he is that, but as Time neglects to mention he is also very calculating and seeks to maximize his influence just as every vain dictator has done before him. While he clamors for attention free people have to consider how long it will be until his outburst comes in the form of a mushroom cloud over Seoul.

The New York Daily News duly notes that preemptive attack is a far cry from the days of the Cold War when a policy of deterrence ruled the day. But as David Halberstam alludes to in his seminal work The Best and The Brightest cold war thought was predicated upon the notion that both sides were rational. However, in an age of terror, we have no such luxury of assuming rationality. Confronting terrorist sleeper cells in Miami and starring down tyrannical rulers with nuclear weapons requires a new approach beyond deterrence. As Japan has learned, preemption provides this basic solution.

Church Report: 50 Most Influential Churches

News reached me this afternoon that the Church Report has published its annual list of the 50 most influential churches in the United States.

[link]

I'm proud to say that two of the top five churches are affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention including Rick Warren's Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, CA and that one church in the top ten is from Oklahoma- Life Church led by Craig Groeschel of Edmond, OK. Only four are located in the Northeast.

At any rate, it's an interesting read both as a social commentary on Christian Evangelicals and as a point of reference to see those congregations which are influential within the US.

Gay Marriage and the Courts

I wanted to take a day or two to let the rulings on gay marriage out of NY and GA percolate before giving a few thoughts. Of course, my initial reaction was relief to learn that the judiciary had opted out of the business of legislating. This gut reaction, however, is only part of the greater whole. Upon further reflection, it occurred to me that the rulings actually place gay marriage supporters in difficult position on top of handing them a tough set back.

[link]

Consider, for weeks now folks on the left have been arguing that gay marriage should be decided by state courts and that no federal marriage amendment to the Constitution was necessary. Democrats like Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, and Russ Feingold have been arguing without ceasing that the FMA was a waste of time and that the issue was best left up to the states.

In many ways, this had been the perfectly pragmatic course. Arguing that the issue was one for the states relegated the discussion to one of procedure. It was a lot easier to make the case against the FMA on federalist grounds than it was to argue that the definition of marriage should actually be changed. The approach was also advantageous because, up until this point, state courts had largely up held an expansive view of marriage in their rulings providing gay marriage proponents with a string of victories beginning with Civil Unions in VT and most recently in redefining marriage for the State of MA.

In light of yesterday’s rulings in NY and GA, future strategies for gay marriage backers have been made infinitely more complicated. Arguing that the issue should be decided on federalist grounds by the states effectively places the movement in an impossible logical paradox. The ruling from NY actually made their case- that the decision was one for the states. The key difference being that it chose not to take an activist approach to the definition and left the question to be decided by the state legislature, not the courts. In other words, the courts made a federalist argument and said that the legislature possesses the right to define marriage as a representation of society- which had been the conservative position all along.

In the end, it leaves the gay marriage movement in an unenviable position. If they oppose the FMA on the basis of federalist grounds then they must accept the decisions rendered on the state level. If they reject the rulings made by states and make appeals to the federal level, then they can no longer make the case that gay marriage is a state issue.

The result is that the movement is forced to argue its true position: that society should redefine marriage. Some on the left have been willing to do this all along and many conservatives have been clamoring to have just this debate. But for the rest, the federalist argument is effectively rendered disingenuous by virtue of having attained what they wanted: gay marriage rulings made by state courts.

Bush: It's Better to Be Right Than Popular

Unfortunately, I didn't catch Larry King's interview with President Bush this evening, but the excerpt above certainly caught my eye.

[link]

When asked whether he was troubled by low poll numbers the President responded, When history looks back, I'd rather be judged as solving problems and being correct, rather than being popular.

Wow. This is the message we've been waiting to hear for months. And it's exactly right. What matters most in the great scheme of things are results. Popularity is fleeting but a legacy of service will stand the test of time. This is the essence of true statemanship- not politics.

The President also offered a vigorous defense of his policies in Iraq saying he would choose the same course even without having found WMD. Bush said, We removed a tyrant, and elaborated little. He really didn't need to. It's a pretty simple matter when you get to the root of the issue.

Anyway, it's good to see the White House on the rebound. This message has been a long time in coming and one the American people need to hear.

A belated Happy Birthday, Mr. President.

The Death of the Moderate Democrat

My apologies for the scant posts in recent days. Things have been rather hectic here. Seeking to be somewhat diligent, the link below takes you to an interesting article in today’s Boston Globe.

[link]

Former Presidential Candidate John Kerry (D-MA) is refusing to endorse fellow Democrat and fellow New Englander Sen. Joe Lieberman in his bid for re-election. The move comes as a sharp departure from most Senate Democrats, including Minority Leader Harry Reid and Sen. Hillary Clinton, who have endorsed Lieberman’s re-election- albeit only in his party primary. Kerry’s decision to withhold support for Lieberman indicates a clear effort to court the party’s far left base and establish himself as liberal.

While this should be news, I can not say that it is really all that big a surprise. The tabloids, columnists and liberal talking heads have bemoaned the loss of so-called moderate Republicans. But recent history bears out just the opposite: it is not moderate Republicans who are a rare breed, it is moderate Democrats who are on the endangered species list.

In many respects, Joe Lieberman represents the last of his kind: a Democrat with strong convictions on race, poverty and social justice, who also possesses conservative family values, is pro-life and espouses a conservative foreign policy (the latter of which seems to be his undoing). It’s ironic that while the majority of Democrat Senators are kowtowing to the left, moderate Democrats are exiting stage right.

In the end, if Joe Lieberman wins his primary, the State of Connecticut will be all the better for it. After all, centrist Democrats connect far better with the general electorate than liberals. But if he loses, he becomes only the latest casualty within a Democrat Party that grows further out of touch with most Americans.

NYT on Ken Lay's Death

Nothing about the Enron trial has been typical. Earlier this morning, I stumbled across this article from the New York Times talking about the death of Enron CEO Ken Lay. [link]

While, there was nothing particularly incendiary about the piece, I did read a quote which struck me as being rather amusing given the circumstance.

Quoting former federal prosecutor Chris Bebel the Times records, The death of Mr. Lay in all likelihood will render the government's hard-fought victory null.

What amuses me about the remarks isn't that the case is made more complicated. This is a good point and we will certainly hear more about it in the coming weeks. But what did amuse me was the part about his death rendering the government's conviction null.

We should keep our eye on the ball here. Death did much more than complicate matters for the government. Death rendered Ken Lay null. Although, it is unfortunate that he will not serve time for his conviction, Lay faced the ultimate form of justice- his life cut short at just over 60 years.

An Apple a Day Keeps the Malware Away

A recent study by a web security firm says that threats to PCs are so widespread that internet users should consider switching to Macs. Apparently, Macs are a good alternative because hackers know that hardly anyone uses them.

Rumor has it that the Sophos Security firm which made the recommendation is under contract by Apple.

Mixed Message on North Korean Missile Test

The big news over the holiday was North Korea’s test launch of some ten missiles- none of which made it further than Japan.

Resultantly, the North Korean missile arsenal has been determined to pose no threat to the United States. The Taepodong-2 missile, which was tested yesterday had the reputed capability of striking America's West Coast. [link]

Typically, Nations around the world have condemned the test, though with the curious exception of China. The Chinese, who have been lobbying hard for Washington’s participation in six-party talks with North Korea, said only that they are seriously concerned with the situation which has already happened…We hope that all the relevant sides ... do more things which are conducive to peace and stability ... and not take any actions to escalate and complicate the situation.

China’s less than solid reaction indicates that its view of the North Korean situation is myopic at best. The issue is that China itself is a “relevant side;” one that has a serious stake in taking leadership over the region's peace and security; and one that needs to do more to influence its Communist ally.

Proclaim Liberty throughout All the Land

Later this evening, I will enjoy one of the most American of spectacles, watching fireworks along the Charles River, only miles away from where the first shots of the Revolutionary War were fired at Lexington and Concord.

Tonight, we will listen to the vibrant strains of the Boston Pops Orchestra and celebrate the birth of our Nation along with hundreds of thousands of Bostonians. My immediate family back in Oklahoma will enjoy fireworks at the Walters Municipal Park along with friends from the neighborhood before proceeding to my Grandfather’s house in the country to pop yet more fireworks in our freshly plowed wheat fields. Elsewhere, dozens of our relatives will gather in nearby Carnegie, OK to mark the occasion in an annual gathering of Native American gourd dancing as they have done for some two hundred years. In contrast, somewhere, thousands of miles away, men and women sweat in the midst of a hot dessert. Independence Day for them is marked by the simple performance of duty, maybe manning checkpoints in Baghdad or patrolling the streets of Kabul.

In all, recent years have taught us a great deal about liberty and accordingly, we have heard a great deal about freedom’s cost. On some level, this seems too simplistic; for it is not enough to say that freedom has a cost when for some freedom has cost everything. But two hundred thirty-one years ago, fifty-six men risked life and limb in affixing their name to this half-baked idea we now call freedom. No one knew the outcome of this experiment in self-governance. There was no template or model for what these founders attempted. Indeed, for most of the war which would follow the vision for the fledgling Nation remained in a considerable state of doubt. Doubts notwithstanding, the men proudly signed, declaring the independence of the thirteen colonies from Great Britain.

Pop history tells us that five of the signers were captured by the British and tried for treason. Twelve allegedly had their homes ransacked and burned while two lost sons serving in the Revolutionary Army. Rumor has it that nine of the fifty-six found hardship and death as a result of their involvement in America’s Revolutionary War.

A recent novel by Khaled Hosseini, titled Kite Runner explores the tenuous existence of freedom in modern Afghanistan. Hosseini follows the life of a wealthy merchant’s son as he escapes to America leaving behind a life disappointment, strife and broken dreams. But the point of the novel is not that freedom is unique to America. The novel demonstrates that freedom is the hope and aspiration of all mankind as each soul yearns to breathe free. Freedom is in many ways a modern version of the great leveler. It is the common thread of celebration which binds the most disparate elements of society- from our soldiers in the Middle East, to Kiowa Indians dancing in Carnegie, OK, to Bostonians celebrating along the Charles.

The most striking aspect of freedom is that it spurs the heart toward greatness. Freedom drives the imagination toward a world of possibility. It gives hope. Yet, as demonstrated in 1776 and on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan, its dreams and visions are not for the timid. It is by its very inception a bold experiment. So bold that it does, in fact, necessitate the willing sacrifice of life and limb as we learned two hundred thirty-one years ago. Throwing off the chains of tyranny in the thirteen colonies was as bold then as offering a vision of liberty for the Middle East is now. The commonality between the two is not necessarily one in particular but one in form. Liberty still mandates strong leadership. It requires a willingness to resolve. And it demands our sacred, eternal cost. Liberty’s reward, however, more than mitigates its costs. In the year of jubilee, be that the year of victory over tyranny, the year a new democracy is founded, or the year our troops return to American soil, the celebration begins when liberty is proclaimed throughout all the land of our tired earth.

And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubile unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family.

-Leviticus 25.10
-Liberty Bell, 1753

When in the Course of Human Events...

On this the 231st anniversary of our Nation's Independence, there seemed no more fitting document to cite than the one that started it all.

[link]


The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred. to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

— John Hancock

New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

Courts Value Whales Over Security

Yet more foolishness out of the judiciary this Monday evening.

A federal judge in Los Angeles issued a restraining order against the US Navy which was in the midst of important war games in the Pacific Ocean. Given the situation with North Korea one would think that the restraining order would be for a grave matter of national security.

So, why would a judge pose such a halt to our national security?

Because the Navy's sonar allegedly poses harm to whales.

Kinda reminds me of the old judge joke:

Q: How many judges does it take to change a light bulb?

A: Just one. He holds it still and the whole world revolves around him.

I guess the joke applies to national security matters as well. The judge clearly has a mandate to protect and defend all whales in the Pacific Ocean.

What is NASA Thinking?

It could be that everything will be fine during tomorrow's launch. Certainly, we will all be praying and hoping for as much. But to read the reports you can't help but wonder what NASA has been thinking.

NASA Administrator Michael Griffin made the call last week that the shuttle Discovery was to follow through with its mission despite early pleas to scrub the launch by its top safety inspector . The inspector wanted repairs made to the shuttle's foam exterior given that cracks in the foam exterior killed seven astronauts aboard the space shuttle Columbia in 2003.

Now, in spite of delays for weather, the launch is schedule to proceed as planned tomorrow. But what makes the story a bit ironic is that the latest delay to the launch is a crack in the foam insulation near the shuttle's external fuel tank.

I will readily grant the point that this is almost certainly one of those things that the non-rocket-scientist's mind will not understand.

But from a management standpoint, it sure seems like a bad call to charge ahead in the face of such an obvious risk. One which had deadly consequences only three years ago.

None of this is, of course, to say that I do not support the astronauts aboard. Just a question of NASA's leadership.

Godspeed Discovery. Our prayers are with you.

Newsweek: Can Daily Kos Control Dems?

Newsweek posed the question, I'll supply the unabashedly conservative answer: we can only hope.

The article above found in the most recent edition of Newsweek explores the impact of left-wing bloggers on the Democratic Party.

[link]

It highlights their rise to power and explains how blogs like Daily Kos hope to take the DNC even further to the left by pandering to the politics of the Iraq war and supposed voter malcontent.

Here's my prediction: if the takeover becomes complete, the GOP can look forward to a legacy of conservative, political victories. After all, we've seen this before. It was left-wing nut cum DNC Chairman Howard Dean whose campaign went down in flames after voters were taken aback by his scream of liberal enthusiasm.

Joking aside, the numbers and outcomes on Election Day demonstrate repeatedly that America is not a liberal Nation. We are a Nation full of humble, hard-working people that swings just right of center- and has for over a century. If the crew on the far left takes the reigns for the Dems, good times are here to stay for the GOP.

Sooners Dominate Early NCAA Rumor Mill

As we enter the third week of the World Cup that never ends, sports fans every where have a bright light amid an otherwise dark period known as summer: football season is just around the corner.

In light of this reason for optimism, we are approximately 61 days, 19 hours, 50 minutes and 6 seconds until Saturday, September 2, 2006, 7:00 PM when the OU Sooners take on UAB.

Accordingly, the early news out of the NCAAs have been all Sooners. Adrian Peterson is picked to win the Heisman. OU is ranked #1 in two pre-season polls. Not a bad way to follow up a less than stellar season in 2005.

Longhorns beware. OU is back!

[link]
 

Pax Plena Copyright © 2011 -- Template created by O Pregador -- Powered by Blogger