Big Progress On Iran!

Big news on the Iran issue today. The five permanent members of the UN Security Council are reportedly said to be "very" close to agreement on a formal rebuke of the Iranian regime. Up to this point, officials from the West have had no small degree of difficulty in bringing on board China and Russia both of whom are sympathetic toward the outlaw state.

The actual text of the statement demands that Iran halt the enrichment of Uranium- the precursor to producing a nuclear weapon. The statement while not be legally binding is hoped to bring pressure to bear on the regime through international isolation without the use of economic sanctions or military force.

The irony of the big news is that the big news is really no news at all. The only progress being made on this issue is being made by Iran, which is now closer to producing a nuclear weapon than ever before. In contrast, the only thing the UN is close to accomplishing is wasting reams upon reams of paper on a non-binding resolution that neither intimidates Iran nor mitigates the situation.

The UN is about as effective as a Frenchman defending Paris.

Does Abramoff Deserve Sympathy?

The Jack Abramoff trial in FL entered its sentencing phase yesterday, but what captured the headlines were the letters of some 260 people who have apparently written to Federal Judge Paul C. Huck on Abramoff's behalf pleading for leniency. In this case, Abramoff is facing up to seven years in prison for fraud charges in the Sunshine State, while he also faces a separate prison sentencing in a corruption case in Washington, DC.

This of course makes one wonder if Abramoff will likely receive any leniency at all from either Judge Huck or his counter part in Washington. The media already has all but sentenced Abramoff to hard time on the chain gang. And any politician still maintaining ties to the embattled lobbyist is about as popular as stocks in Napster. But all these surface assessments make me wonder, are we really asking the important questions in this case? Perhaps, in the frenzy to judge, we fail to address a much deeper question- is Abramoff really the monster everyone seems to think he is? Or is Abramoff the easy way out of a perennial problem?

In an old post on this topic back in January, I alluded to this point rather furtively but in June of 2004 I had the very brief opportunity to meet Jack Abramoff. Abramoff was at a DC cocktail party addressing members of the College Republican National Board of which I served given my tenure as State Chairman of the New Hampshire College Republicans. At this gathering, Abramoff spoke eloquently of meeting President Ronald Reagan in the Oval Office and talking to him about the College Republicans youth movement- which to this day is the largest, best-funded and most respected organization for youth politics in America (yes, I am quite biased). Abramoff spoke in simple language about having conservative values; about the need to motivate the next generation of the GOP; about the sanctity of life and about President Reagan's leadership in shepherding conservatives toward many a policy victory in the 1980s.

In all, Abramoff struck me as being genuinely interested in what College Republicans were doing and about organizing and re-loading the party for the next generation of Republican leadership. He seemed eager to talk with many of us about the ideas we had for our states and he seemed to sincerely mourn the loss of a great man given Reagan's death during the week before our meeting. According to the letters written, Abramoff was also apt to give very generous sums of money toward charities and community projects, besides his local synagogue.

So, what's the point?

I think a part of the point is that although Abramoff's actions were without a doubt ethically suspect, it is not the case that Abramoff is the villain he has been made him out to be. I think if a ranking existed for political corruption, Abramoff at best would rival the likes of Richard Nixon, which admittedly is not an inconsequential level of abasement. However, I would not quite place Abramoff's actions in league with say Ted Kennedy and the Chappaquiddick incident, for example.

Still, I think there's more to this issue than comparing sins and digging up bones. In my view, Abramoff represents as much an archetype for corruption as he represents an archetype for the political prodigal son. It was one of my favorite philosophers, Friedrich Nietzsche who wrote, What is good? All that heightens the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself in man. When looking for a way to succinctly evaluate Jack Abramoff, I can think of no better summation than this phrase.

Abramoff demonstrated to me that summer even while he was sinking further into corruption (and apparently to many others as well given the volume of letters written on his behalf) that he possessed a very strong devotion to the conservative movement in addition to other such worthy causes as the various charities and community projects he supported. But the existential dilemma of power that we see in Abramoff is that when power becomes the only good we seek in life, it is at that point when power seeks to replicate itself and soon becomes not only the good but also the will. When this will to power becomes the driving force within a man, it is then that Lord Acton's warning becomes most salient, Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

I believe Abramoff is an archetype for corruption because he symbolizes an easy way for society to deal with the perennial problem of lobbying ethics. Abramoff was everything the ambitious and driven are inspired to become. Abramoff had wealth; he had power; he had connections; he had passion and he had intellect all of which are fine qualities to have in general, not only in politics. But in the end, these things corrupted and supplanted his ideals and the bedrock of who he was as a person. It is probably this aspect of the situation that people find most infuriating. What makes us quick to seek punishment is not that Abramoff's actions are utterly reprehensible. On the contrary, his actions are quite comparable to what lobbyists do in Washington do every day.

What makes Abramoff's sins so egregious is that he blatantly ignored the rules of propriety and took the will to power to another level. Rather than operate behind the scenes as many lobbyists do, Abramoff flaunted his ties to the powerful and paraded his ability to connect clients with the movers and shakers. In this way, Abramoff is the personification of the political prodigal son who never returns to the fold. Through his embrace of Nietzsche's will to power as the will of man, Abramoff transcends conventional levels of corruption and becomes the new archetype for an American society frustrated with a seemingly reprobate political process. Regardless of whether or not Abramoff's actions were really all that bad in the first place, society needs its lightening rod and for now Abramoff is it.

In conclusion let me be clear, I am not nor will I argue that Abramoff deserves sympathy- though I believe there is a strong argument to be made. Perhaps, that argument would even be founded upon what I have outlined above. But I will say that the solution to the problem actually lies within the problem itself. As citizens exercising the rule of self governance, the onus of responsibility in the problem of crooked lobbying rests within the American people's ability to demand meaningful lobbying reform.

America must re-evaluate what is acceptable with regards to lobbying, ethics and our elected officials. The problem of Abramoff is only a problem because Americans have allowed it to be so. Until the American people find an incentive to overcome the hurdle of collective action on this issue, the specter of Abramoff will remain starring us back in the mirror- haunting fedora and all.

Afghan Christian Gives Muslim Clerics the Slip

Posting as a follow up to last week's discussion of an Afghan man facing the death penalty for his conversion to Christianity, the man Abdul Rahman was released late last night and has reportedly vanished upon his release.

Officials are not certain as to the man's whereabouts but there is some speculation that he could have left the country in search of asylum and medical attention. All indications are that the courts ruled the man to be mentally unstable in effort to avoid a contentious trial. The debate was inflamed mainly by heated arguments from Western & Christian organizations demanding Rahman's release. These protests in turn prompted a strong reaction from Muslim clerics who demanded Rahman be sentenced to death for his apostasy.

As for the man's disappearance, really none could be the wiser. With thousands of Islamic clerics calling for his death, Abdul Rahman stood about as much chance of living a normal life there as Lou Dobbs does of voting Republican.

Al Gore TV

Fox News is reporting that ex-VP and failed Presidential candidate, Al Gore, Jr., will see his media "empire" expand into 8 million homes by this summer.

Fortunately for Americans, this means that only three tenths of one percent of all Americans actually have the potential to be tortured by Gore's programming.

Let's just say Gore has a long way to go before he's the next Ted Turner. Then again, he probably invented CNN too.

Dixie Chicks 'Not Ready to Make Nice'- Set to Tank Again

AOL's astute entertainment section is reporting that country music "may" be inclined to make nice with the Dixie Chicks even if the Dixie Chicks aren't ready to make nice with country music.

In the 123 music markets which make up the Billboard rankings, the Chicks haven't been in the music rotation since 2003 when lead singer Natalie Maines declared to a London crowd, "Just so you know, we're ashamed the President of the United States is from Texas."

The new album due for release in may has been noticeably different than their prior work which had a more definitive country flavor. For starters, the current album was put together by a rock and rap producer and has been described as being oriented toward rock- a genre that has a long history of producing left-leaning musicians.

By all accounts from the Heartland, the country music industry has not begun to thaw the chill between the wayward daughters. Only 41 of the 123 markets have even attempted to play the new material. One of the largest country music markets, St. Louis, removed the album from the rotation after listeners sent in thousands of complaints.

It seems that for most markets the Dixie Chicks have been a "Long Time Gone" from the industry-perhaps too long for them to craft a liberal niche in a conservative industry. As the Chicks say well, "There's Your Trouble."

Remembering Buck Owens

Word has gone around the news cycle that former "Hee Haw" co-host and country music legend, Buck Owens has passed away at 76 years of age.

Buck Owens was famous for playing a red, white and blue guitar and singing about everything from "Whiskey, Cigarettes and Wild, Wild Women," to "Waitin' in Your Welfare Line." His most recent hit came in a collaboration with Dwight Yoakham called, "Streets of Bakersfield" in 1988 which propelled Owens back to the top of the country music charts. This led to two more albums including a duet with Ringo Starr in 1989.

In a 1992 interview, Owens wrote his epitaph saying, "I'd like to be remembered as a guy that came along and did his music, did his best and showed up on time, clean and ready to do the job, wrote a few songs and had a hell of a time."

Not a bad way to check out.

Giuliani Sticks OSU Students with a $100,000 Tab

In a speech that made headlines in the Sooner State, former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani gave remarks to a crowd of three thousand people at the Gallagher-Iba Arena on the campus of Oklahoma State University in Stillwater, OK. It is worth mentioning that the arena was not in use because Oklahoma State's basketball season ended long ago.

Anyway, Giuliani, largely seen as a candidate for President, demurred on the issue of seeking the Republican nomination saying he would put off a decision to run until 2007. In keeping with his regular cadre of stump speeches on the issue, Giuliani offered that Republican victories in 2006 were crucial in order to continue the war on terror.

The biggest headline came when the former mayor said he was privileged to speak at OSU. And why shouldn't he be? Giuliani was paid $100, 000 for his services this afternoon out of student fees to university.

Beards Are Back

Today's copy of the New York Times heralded a new era for the fashion conscious: beards are back. The article, written by Eric Wilson, remarks that young professionals (read, yuppies) are increasingly interested in letting it all, grow out.

From the likes of George Clooney to the runways of Ralph Lauren,the article makes the case that men across the urban jungle are growing beards in response to last year's surge of metrosexuals. The move is aimed at reasserting masculinity and dispensing with the "pretty boy" look of shaving.

Please rest comfortably, Nation. This blogger will neither join the likes of the metrosexuals, nor join the bandwagon of the bearded revolution. According the article only 2-3% of American women find beards attractive. This seems reason enough to avoid an otherwise unsightly decision.

Russian Spies Aided Iraq?

Soon, the BBC photo at right may be a distant memory. According to a recent inquiry made by the United States Joint Forces Command, in the run up to the war with Iraq, Russian intelligence passed along information from U.S. Central Command in Doha Qatar regarding the positioning of American troops and plans for a false invasion from Kuwait.

The report released yesterday came after weeks of reviewing a sizable cache of captured Iraqi documents and interviews with members of Saddam's military and political advisors.

The information passed along, however, proved to be erroneous to the Iraqi regime. The Russian intelligence was said to claim that the coalition's attack on Baghdad would come from the west while awaiting aid from the 4th Infantry Division in north. In fact, the attack on Baghdad came from the south without the aid of the 4th ID at all.

The misleading nature of the information passed along by the Russians has led some policy experts to speculate that the intelligence was actually part of an American campaign to deliberately confuse and disorient the Iraqis using identified Russian spies as conduits for an attack of propaganda. This point is, perhaps unsurprisingly, left out of the Joint Forces report.

While the inquiry adds little to the military implications of the war, it does make the political fallout for the up coming G8 summit a bit more interesting. Russia will host the gathering of World leaders this July in St. Petersburg, hometown of Russian Dictator- I mean, President Vladimir Putin.

Personally, I cannot imagine the tension involved in sitting across a foreign head of state and knowing that the other had purposely tried to harm our mission in Iraq. After being declared a "good man" by President Bush in the aftermath of 9/11, it seems Russia's Putin has a great deal of explaining to do and not only regarding their Iraqi espionage activities. The Russians have increasingly frustrated western Nations on their lack of cooperation in firmly sanctioning Iranian nuclear activities. This in addition to American concern over Russia's growing military relationship with China- a Nation largely seen as sympathetic to the Iranians, besides being America's greatest economic competitor.

It could be that the entire situation is easily explained by some wisdom from a different time. It was British poet, William Blake who said years ago, "When a sinister person means to be your enemy, they always start by trying to become your friend." Perhaps this statement best explains both the motivation and present actions of Russian President Putin.

78 Year Old Woman Recruited for Marines

I knew our military had a recruitment problems but this is ridiculous.

A 78 year-old woman from Santa Clara, CA was recruited in recent days to join the Marines.

The woman who walks with the aid of a walker and looks to suffer from poor eye-sight, was apparently sought for her unique language abilities.

What Would Jesus Do on Immigration?

This is the question Senator Hillary Clinton of NY would have us ask as we consider immigration policy. It is curious, to say the least, that after years of having remained silent and fallen well short of anything even remotely resembling a public profession faith suddenly Sen. Clinton would have such a great awakening (forgive the pun) and invoked the name of the Savior in opposing Sen. Frist's immigration proposal. Great awakening or preparation for the 2008 Presidential election, you tell me.

At any rate, the National Review has been quick to call the Senator on her sudden conversion and notes the fallacy of her claim that the bill would "criminalize...Jesus, Himself." The article is quite lucid, applying common sense to Clinton's lunacy.

While Hillary's accusations are easily proven foolish, the more pressing question for me is actually the very one Sen. Clinton would disingenuously have us consider. What would Jesus do about immigration? The answer would fall as most answers do- somewhere in the middle.

It was clear in the Gospel account of the woman at the well that the Lord was no respecter of borders or menial, national differences. He was far more concerned about people's souls than from where they came. But it is also clear that Jesus had deep respect for rules governing the lives of men. His exhortation in Matthew was to give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to give to God what is God's.

From this, I think there are a couple of interesting policy applications to be made. First, the immigration laws which ultimately do pass should not be discriminatory against Latinos in any way. Jesus was concerned about people's souls and their relationships with God, not their skin color or National origin. Accordingly, our policy should be concerned with both the security of our border and the welfare of those who seek to come here. We should not structure our immigration policy in such a way that any Latino feels he or she is any less American because of their race. The real issue is about illegal immigration, not immigration as such and this is a point which needs to be reinforced as the dialogue continues.

Second, given the Lord's interest in respect for rule of law, I think there is something to be said for having stricter laws dealing with those individuals who would come to the U.S. illegally. We should not reward people who break the law. Jesus recognized this point and ordered the crowd to pay taxes to a government they disliked, which was far more oppressive than any immigration policy currently on record.

Yet, there seems to be a clear incentive from a perspective of compassion to make the opportunities of our Nation available to all who would pursue the American dream by legal means. I do not think this includes amnesty for those who are already here illegally- that would be tantamount to rewarding their illegal trespass, which the Lord clearly did not advocate. Otherwise, Jesus would have instructed the crowd to forget about paying taxes to government altogether. However, I think it does mean that we should provide citizenship to those who would pursue it and not make America a closed Nation. This view, I believe, both upholds the respect of human dignity and respects the rule of law. I would hope that in the end, our policy will resemble something like what I have described above. Even if it does not, the point remains that we should put both the issue and the Savior above a cheap invocation of scripture.

Reid Cries Filibuster on Immigration Reform

Senate Minority Leader, Harry Reid (D-NV), yesterday, threatened to filibuster a measure by Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist aimed at addressing the growing threat from illegal immigration (Click here for details on Frist's bill).

Some of the Minority Leader's complaints and potential nodes of compromise include the mandate for a "guest worker" program and a "path to citizenship" for all illegals currently residing in the United States.

Two points: First, while I know that Sen. Frist's measure has no small degree of political posturing, it occurs to me that Harry Reid's threat only reinforces Democrats' public perception as the "Do-Nothing Party" (Ah, so that's what the D stands for!). Recent Zogby poll numbers indicate that 62% of all Americans support restrictive policies regarding illegal immigration and a potential guest worker program. Politically, Reid is simply out of touch with the majority of Americans.

Second, rather than using the filibuster card, Democrats need to come up with some original policy ideas aimed at addressing the issue. Americans deserve better than the "Party of No." Yet the Democrats under Reid's leadership do little to actually help their vision along. Instead of offering concrete alternatives which can be debated and vetted in the Senate, Reid offers the use of parliamentary procedure as the Democrats' only solution to all of the problems in America today.

Contrary to the Minority Leader's proposal, Americans are interested in results. Perhaps not all of the solutions offered by Senator Frist are right for the American people. Indeed, they may not be. But one solution is better than a thousand road blocks to progress on the issue.

New Kicker in Big D

Finally, the Dallas Cowboys have hired a kicker they can be proud of.

CNN SI is reporting that the Cowboys have netted former Indianapolis Colts kicker Mike Vanderjagt for the up-coming season.

Dallas lost three games by a total of three points or less. A kicker is a key piece of the Cowboys puzzle.

Christians Lobby Bush for Afghan Convert

The Church Report is getting the word out via email that Christians across the Nation are rallying behind Afghan citizen Abdul Rahman and urging President Bush to intervene on his behalf. Rahman is the man facing the death penalty for his conversion to Christianity several decades ago.

The American Family Association (AFA) of Tupelo, MS says that its efforts have prompted 200,000 supporters to email President Bush regarding the incident. The group is dissatisfied with the State Department's response to inquiries which said that the matter was left up to the Afghan courts. The only reaction from the President came yesterday when Bush said, "We expect them to honor the universal principle of freedom."

The best analysis of the situation actually comes from the AFA's Chairman Donald Wildmon who remarked, "This is not the kind of government and courts our soldiers are fighting and dying for." To this Blogger, the point is well taken. The issue Wildmon raises directly speaks to the tension between the American and Arab visions for the region as discussed a few days ago when the story first broke. What Wildmon neglects to mention is that the efforts of our troops have wildly succeeded in producing a different Afghan Government than the one they began fighting.

Even so, the task of fostering change, resulting from America's interest in furthering democracy, must begin on the most basic level of education and out-reach. Wildmon is also right in part. American soldiers are not in Afghanistan or Iraq to produce governments where religious belief is restricted. Our objective according to the Administration is to foster democratic governments in the region bringing peace to those societies over time.

In turn, this case becomes a major threshold for the President's policy. Evangelicals and conservatives alike will bring pressure to bear on the White House regarding the issue. How the Administration responds to that pressure will be a tremendous test of its vision and credibility- both politically and for the future of Afghanistan.

Chef is Dead

Although I only saw the end of the episode last night, the BBC gives a better spoiler than I can of the first installment of South Park's 10th season. In the end, Chef is killed off by a mountain lion and a bear.

Alas, Chef was a funny character, but sometimes it's good for a series to shake up the cast.

Apparently, that's the thinking of Congressional Republicans calling for a shake up at the White House as well.

DNA Evidence Clears Dallas Man After 18 Years

In contrast to some Republicans, I am a strong advocate of DNA testing. And cases like this are the reason why.

The advent of technology now enables us to conclusively determine in many instances the guilt or innocence of a person. For Gary Wallis, this will not reclaim his 18 years, but it can ensure that he is free to enjoy the remainder of his life.

For the skeptics, however, the prognosis also works the other way. in Virginia, under the direction of Governor Mark Warner, DNA testing confirmed guilt in the case of Roger K. Coleman- a man who proclaimed his innocence despite being both a rapist and muderer.

Given the advent of the technology, it only makes sense to utilize it in cases where guilt or innocence is in question and the technology can conclusively deliver the truth.

South Park & Scientologists

Apparently the BBC has finally picked up on the growing South Park schism over a recent episode satirizing the Church of Scientology. According to the report, the voice of "Chef" left the program after the show made fun of his church and was insensitive to "personal, spiritual beliefs."

To which the shows' co-creator, Matt Stone, replied, "In 10 years and over 150 episodes of South Park, Isaac [Chef] never had a problem with the show making fun of Christians, Muslims, Mormons or Jews. He got a sudden case of religious sensitivity when it was his religion featured on the show."

This is the missing point of the whole debacle. South Park makes fun of everything from politics, to personalities to religions. When people watch the show, they know what to expect and they understand the politically incorrect nature of the programming. As a Christian, there is much on the show to offend me, but that is the risk I take when watching the show. Truth be told, if any religious group has a right to complain it is Christians because the show features both "Jesus," and "Satan" among its cast of characters.

The point is not that we should foster religious hate on our network programming. Or even that we should keep score of which faiths are offended most. Though that might be the suggestion Prince Charles would make. The point is that if we are going to be a society which engages in satire we should be wiling to do so across the board rather than discriminately picking on a few faiths. Stone is right. Scientologists should get their day on the hot seat, just as the show takes aim at Christians, Muslims and Jews.

Root Canal = No blogging

I've had a bunch of excuses lately for not blogging. But this one tops them all.

This morning, as I was pouring myself a cup of coffee, I felt an excruciating pain in my lower molar. I tried to tough it out at work drinking cold water to numb the pain but it didn't help.

Averting my fear of doctors, I went to the dentist and a root canal was prescribed.

As a result, I have been doped up on Vicodin and unable to blog. Not fun.

Women, Law and Obstacles to Success

The NY Times, ever the bastion for gender parity, ran an article today discussing what already seems intuitive to everyone else: there are fewer women partners in law firms than men.

The article isn't very interesting but for some blanket insinuations made at the very end. The Times writes:
    FOR years, one pat response to that question was that once law school graduation rates substantially equalized between men and women, that pipeline would fuel firm diversity and cause partnerships to equalize as well. Yet the pipeline has been gushing for about two decades and partnership disparity remains.
    Although women certainly leave firms to become more actively involved in child-rearing, recent detailed studies indicate that female lawyers often feel pushed into that choice and would prefer to maintain their careers and a family if a structure existed that allowed them to do so. Some analysts and many women who practice law say that having children isn't the primary reason most women leave law firms anyhow; most, they say, depart for other careers or for different ways to practice law.
This is true. Since gender equality became a major social issue two decades ago, more women have entered law school, graduated from the same, and taken jobs in major firms. I do not dispute that data that there are fewer female partners on average. But the fact is not limited to women in law. This is true across a variety of professions.

More to the point, however, the real question in this discussion, is "Why?" In this case, the NY Times attempts to over explain for an other wise quantifiable and consistent phenomena. That fewer women are partners is a clear fact but to suggest that there are fewer female partners because they can not pursue both career and family is a misrepresentation of the issue.

The real point is that it is difficult for women to do both but the issue rests as much on the reality of time and priority as it does upon the reality of corporate structure. The fact is that in law women have always been challenged to pursue both simultaneously because there is no way to alter the professional structure to allow for women to commit equally to both child-rearing and career advancement. In a time sensitive and time intensive legal career, cases will not wait and court dockets are not put on hold. Similarly, kids will not stop growing and you cannot reclaim time lost when they are young.

The problem is not structure so much as it is a discontent with a reality of life and the need to prioritize accordingly. Admittedly, this does not make the situation any easier but it is helpful in understanding the real core of the problem. Rather than bemoaning a situation we can neither change nor alter, it makes sense to adjust and recognize that life is on some level about trade offs and making smart decisions- a reality that is true for both men and women.

Afghanistan: Man Faces Death Penalty for Christian Faith

The news out of Afghanistan is hard to fathom, given recent American military intervention against the Taliban and the country's relatively new government- formally signed into effect on January 16, 2004.

Even so, Fox News is reporting that a medical aid worker is currently facing death penalty charges for converting to Christianity some 16 years ago.

The presiding judge has said that the conversion is "an attack on Islam," noting the country's Shariah law which states that Muslims rejecting the Islamic faith can and should be sentenced to death. The judge is expected to rule on the case within the next couple of months.

While the situation has not reached a conclusion, it does beg the question of the types of governments we hope to see emerge from our intervention in the Middle East. Afghanistan has widely been championed as a beacon of progressive values within the region, but cases like this demonstrate that the country is an example only in degree.

It is accepted among academic and foreign policy circles that any democracy coming out of the Middle East will possess democratic values in a limited extent relative to our own. I think, however, that the sheer differences between our democratic institutions and theirs would surprise most Americans. While Afghanistan may be a budding democracy, its laws on this point are archaic at best and barbaric at worst.

As a result, some would argue that we have no right to impose our system of government on Arab Nations in general and that as a result our efforts are doomed to fail. In my view, this perspective undermines the very fabric which constitutes our American Experiment.

A cursory history lesson will show that our Nation was founded upon the assumption that men have a right and innate yearning to be free and exercise self-governance. In turn, I do not argue that our efforts to bring freedom to the region are for naught. However, I do believe that the case offers us a stark warning: if America would see democracy flourish in the Middle East, we have to encourage social change on a more basic level, starting with younger generations of Arabs as opposed to wholesale political restructuring only.

We can not expect the Ayatollahs and Mullahs of the region to foster any type of progressive change apart from some conscious effort of our own to reach out to young Arabs and demonstrate the merits of democratic governance. America's challenge is now one of public relations as much as it is one of tactical, military engagement.

Cowboys Sign Terrell Owens

As reported to you last week, the deal is done. Terrell Owens will be a Cowboy next year.

Dallas signed the troubled wideout Saturday.

The Cowboys need him too. Dallas has missed the playoffs the last two seasons and hasn't won a playoff game in nine years.

Huge Party in OK!

It should be a heck of a party! After all, Governor Brad Henry is allocating 17 million dollars for the celebration.

My home state, turns 100 years old next year and already preparations are underway to mark the event. The funds are expected to go toward various festivals across the state and two floats for OK's all-state band members to participate in the Rose Bowl and Macy's Thanksgiving Day parades.

Believe it or not, the cost is actually down from the original 30 million dollars the Governor initialy requested.

It will be a fun event and it only comes once. Oh well.

So much for the Governor's education priority...

Frist's Border Security Bill: Political Fallout or Foresight?

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) moved ahead of the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, introducing his own bill to tighten America's borders (As you can see for the picture at right, they certainly need tightening).

The move is regarded in the New York Times as a political fallout with President Bush because the bill does not include mention of a guest worker program, which the President has long championed.

Instead, the measure would make permanent a pilot program's electronic database which registers immigrants eligibility to work, besides already agreed upon measures of adding more border guards, more fencing and deporting illegal immigrants faster. All of which does an Irish jig to the tune of more funding (Happy St. Patrick's Day).

Rather than a political fallout, however, Senator Frist's op-ed in the National Review adds bulk to his credentials with the Republican rank and file who are increasingly concerned about America's transparent borders. Should a version of the measure pass, the win will validate Frist's willingness to take on controversial issues and get results- a claim on border security no one in the crowded Republican primary field can make. For now, whether the database would actually work given employers who might prefer to hire illegal workers on the cheap is irrelevant to Frist's political calculus. The merits of the idea are not as central to the political climate as a final product of some sort.

In the end, Frist's submission of his own legislation is not so much a fallout as it is the foresight of Presidential candidate who is building a record of accomplishments for a contentious primary. Given recent public malcontent, Frist may have picked the issue which defines his presidential bid.

Why I love Dartblog

I know I'm a bit behind the curve, but the above link indicates why I love Joe's Dartblog.

It is not for the fact that its author concurrently blogs for the National Review, nor is it because of our mutual Dartmouth Beacon connection.

Joe's Dartblog is great because Joe recognizes a fundamental point of life: Starbucks Coffee is infinitely inferior to Dunkin Donuts.

Nothing beats a Dunkin Donuts' Hazelnut Coffee with cream and sugar, which has now become a daily part of my routine.

More Posturing: Feingold Takes Aim at 'Cowering' Democrats

I mentioned earlier that the Cowboys were posturing to acquire Terrell Owens, it seems they have simply taken a play from the Democrats' Russ Feingold.

Feingold is the Senator from Wisconsin who called for a censure of President Bush for the NSA's Terrorist Surveillance program. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist led the Republicans counter, fresh off a strong showing at the Southern Republican Leadership caucus in Memphis. Frist called Feingold's bluff and was prepared to move on the motion bringing it to a vote of the full Senate- a vote which would only further isolate Democrats from the majority of Americans in the 2006 elections.

In turn, Feingold's motion was nixed though Frist threatens to call the question should Democrats press the issue. The move by Feingold is largely a symbolic obeisance to the far left who would see Democrats take issue with the President and his handling of the war in Iraq and the War on Terror. Many analysts view the motion as an attempt by Feingold to curry support in hopes of garnering the Democrat Presidential Nomination in 2008.

China Refuses Its Citizens

The thought had never occurred to me: what does the Government do with foreign citizens who are denied immigration to the U.S. if their home countries refuse to have them?

Apparently, American tax payers foot their bill. It is little wonder that Secretary Chertoff is due to press China on the matter in travels to the region later this month. The expense is projected to be enormous.

Personally, I don't understand why we can't put them on the next flight to Beijing and leave them there.

Liberal Blogs Go After Lieberman

Several liberal blogs such as Crooks and Liars, have decided to launch an invective against one of the most conservative Democrats in the U.S. Senate (that's moderate to anyone who is not a Democrat).

Joe Lieberman was castigated on the above blog for being sensible and applauded for his bipartisan outreach to Republicans. Democrats are hoping to unseat Lieberman, CT's Senior Senator and a member of their own party, while replacing him with a more liberal Senator.

Cowboys Move to Land T.O.

With the players union pacified, business as usual returned to the NFL and today marked a major move on the part of my favorite team the Dallas Cowboys.

Da Boys released veteran wide receiver Keyshawn Johnson (as a rule, wide receivers are the players that actually catch football passes, for the very few of you who read this and have no idea).

By releasing this player, the Cowboys make room in their salary cap and leave the door open to attract one of the top receivers in the league Terrell Owens.

Owens had a clash with his team's officials last year and was benched for the rest of the season by the Philadelphia Eagles.

The Cowboys have never been gun shy to hire controversial players- including flamboyant luminaries as Deion Sanders and Michael Irvin- to the decision is largely seen as posturing for the Cowboys to make the acquisition.

New Toys = No Blogging

My apologies readers for the dearth of blogs today.

Some of you will recall that I lost my ipod while I was back home over the Christmas break. After saving up for a few weeks, I decided to bite the bullet and get a new one. Not to brag, but I have been playing with the new toy for most of the evening rather than committing myself to posting like I should.

I must say, it is quite the piece of musical listening excellence. Sleek design. Weighing less than an average cell phone. Thin. This particular model has 30 gigs with a black exterior. Not to mention the fact that I can actually listen to music on my morning commute again!

Very exciting.

White House Fatigue?

You bet, according to the Washington Post. An article set for release in Monday's daily makes the covert case that members of President Bush's team are wearing down after six years on the job.

Focusing mainly on Chief of Staff Andy Card, the article notes well the grueling schedule political advising and appointment entail. Unfortunately, the ulterior motive behind the article is to say that the White House is losing its edge.

Despite less than stellar poll numbers, it's important to add context to recent signs of public unrest. The Administration has understandably been under duress- some might say this is a part of the task of governance and I would agree. What remains lost in this observation, however, is the intense nexus of circumstances which have created a disquieted public. Let's take a trip down memory lane to get a better grasp of the current state of political affairs:

Tracking numbers back to last year's Inauguration, it was clear to most Americans that the insurgency in Iraq was growing. But lost on poll numbers is the fact that the United States, in addition to fighting insurgent forces, had also been tasked with building and repairing Iraq's infrastructure- helping to rebuild everything from oil production to basic utilities such a water, electricity and food.

February also marked a month of increased car bombings, while March brought the politically ill-fated Terri Schiavo fiasco which divided the Nation.

Early April marked the death of Pope John Paul II as Americans saddened by the news concurrently saw tens of thousands of Islamic protestors marching in support of radical Shia cleric Moqtada Sadr and in opposition to the U.S. liberation of Iraq.

May bade worse tidings for the Bush Administration with allegations being circulated around the world of Koran desecration by American troops, and escalation in the North Korean stand-off as the communist regime fired test missiles towards the Sea of Japan.

June signaled a month of fire outbreaks across the desert Southwest, in addition to the confirmation of a second case of Mad Cow Disease in the United States. July marked the beginning of Rove Gate, the London subway bombings, the launch of a Congressional inquiry into American collusion with the Brits on Iraq, focusing on the Downing Street Memo, the embarrassing delay of the first shuttle launch since the Columbia disaster, the resignation announcement of Sandra Day O'Connor and the hospitalization of Chief Justice William Rehnquist.

When it seemed that the waning summer months would provide some relief from the bad publicity and hectic spring, August brought the ubiquitous seasonal jokes about President Bush's vacation to Crawford, the resumption of Iran's nuclear enrichment program, increased violence in Iraq, mounting concerns over border security, Republican embarrassments in the conviction of Governor Bob Taft of Ohio and Pat Robertson's call to assassinate Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, and the mother of all political catastrophes, Hurricane Katrina.

September saw no restraint in circumstances with the death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist, the revelation of Scooter Libby as the source in the Plame investigation, continued violence in Iraq, embarrassing remarks by Republican activist Bill Bennett, continued fallout from inadequate preparation leading up to Hurricane Katrina and the indictment of Republican House Majority Leader Tom Delay.

October brought more woes still with the indictment of VP Cheney's Chief of Staff, Scooter Libby, the nomination and withdrawal of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, increased sensitivity to the threat of Bird Flu, reports of a credible threat to NYC's subway system, and a massive earthquake which leveled portions of Northern India resulting in a humanitarian crisis.

November saw Republican Gubernatorial defeats in VA and NJ, in addition to reports about illegal CIA interrogation facilities in Eastern Europe, bad publicity about the U.S. military's information offensive in Baghdad newspapers and the defeat of CA Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's Special Election ballot measures besides continued violence and military operations in Iraq.

Finally, December brought with it some respite as the Administration was left to confront critics of the Iraq war, and face the looming specter of crisis in a nuclear Iran who denies the Holocaust.

From the quasi-exhaustive outline of events in 2005, it is clear that the President and his staff were forced to confront a number of exigencies of both a political and policy nature. It can be inferred that the series of events left Americans sullen about the direction of the country, even though there is effectively little the Executive Branch could have done to mitigate any of these points of irritation with the exception of a better plan for Hurricane relief in New Orleans- a point not entirely the White House's fault given poor planning on even the state level. Based on the time line, it is also evident that the White House was hard pressed to catch any sort of break to turn their political fortunes around.

Given the above observations, the President's political problems can hardly be ruled the product of a fatigued staff. Rather, it indicates an unique moment in history, with a conflux of forces which led to public malcontent. Perhaps some of the President's team are tired. But the Post is remiss to diagnose the problem as one of tired staff when the evidence points to extraneous circumstance affecting public opinion.

A better question for exploration is to wonder how the White House managed to maintain its efficiency in 2005 despite having so many obstacles in its path. After all, passing two conservative Supreme Court Justices in the U.S. Senate, clearing sweeping intelligence overhaul, decreasing unemployment by 5%, passing the first national energy plan in over 10 years, and taking measures aimed at curbing frivolous lawsuits isn't bad for a "beleaguered" White House team that has lost its touch.

Bush to Talk Iraq

The BBC is reporting that President Bush will begin anew his defense of America's Iraq policy later today.

The speeches are set to discuss progress made in training Iraqi security forces, defeating a resilient insurgency in Iraq and progress made along the path to political solvency.

In my view, the speech comes at a crucial point. Although recent poll numbers are not the end all be all, they do indicate that the American people see far more negative news about Iraq coming from the American press and not nearly enough of the positive, day to day progress being made on the ground.

It is important for the President to talk in simple, straight-forward language and candidly update the American people both of the progress being made and on the President's plan for bring American troops home, albeit short of setting time tables.

Approval from the American people will only come when their apprehensions are addressed. This series of speeches will be a good step toward addressing those concerns.

March Madness Begins

I must say, I rather enjoyed today's Big 12, Men's Basketball Championship, which saw the Kansas Jayhawks defeat the Texas Longhorns 80-68.

Today's, newly released bracket shows OU taking on the UW-Milwaukee. A number six seed, Oklahoma should advance easily to take on FL in the 2nd game of the opening rounds. Oklahoma joins Oral Roberts University of Tulsa, OK as the only teams from the Sooner State to make the Big Dance.

In all, four teams from the Big 12 were invited to post season competition: OU, Texas, Kansas and Texas A&M.

Hollywood Earnings Tank

The BBC is quick to report that Hollywood is suffering a 6% loss of revenue this year, with attendance dropping to 1.4 billion people for the year.

Is this really news? If you've been to any movies recently you will see that Hollywood hasn't exactly been producing crowd pleasing hits. Even our Best Picture nominees at the Oscars consisted of low budget, trendy films which most Americans did not care to see when they were in theaters. As a sample, the films themselves were movies about an author only an artistic elite can appreciate and gay cowboys. Yeah, those are going to sell a lot of tix.

Is it any wonder why ticket sales decreased this year? The lesson for Hollywood is simple- make better movies.

Justice Served: Slobodan Milosevic Dead


Justice was dealt an early hand as the Butcher of the Balkans, Slobodan Milosevic, was found dead in his cell at the Hague.

Milosevic suffered from various heart ailments and apparently died of natural causes.

Views of Islam

Substantiating my previous entry, the Washington Post ran an article today outlining the latest poll numbers of Americans views on Islam.

The poll revealed that 46% of Americans view Islam negatively- a figure which is even greater than immediately following the September 11th attacks.

Lessons from Dubai Ports World: Squeaky Wheels Get Grease

My buddy Joe over at Dartblog has a great post on the Dubai Ports fiasco. Taking Joe's argument a slightly different way, it is not difficult to observe why the whole issue was blown out of proportion.

First, Joe argues that the American people are too incompetent en masse to understand the financial aspects of mergers and acquisitions of companies- in this case that company which was formerly taking care of American ports. On this point, I agree.

The entire situation is confusing. It is difficult to understand that it is not the UAE controlling American waters but a company from the UAE which bought a British company who was taking care of American ports at the time. As you can see, even from this simple description it is a mouthful to say and not easily condensed into talking points on the evening news.

By extending Joe's argument that the Dubai Ports issue is an abuse of representation, we also can make the case that the problem boils down to one of information. Specifically, the sources providing information to the American people about the Dubai Ports issues did an inadequate job of explaining the facts to the populace.

In this case, the Dubai ports served as the squeaky wheel of public antipathy, while the media were quick to bestow upon it enough grease to force the dominant political party they dislike to fracture on the point.

The facts of the case were only ancillary in media reports of public malcontent with the President, conveniently igrnoring the obvious racial backlash against Arabs- a mixed message at best given our efforts to liberate Iraq.

Unfortunately, Congressional leaders of both parties have decided that an election year is more important than changing Americans perception of the Arab world.

Vermont Towns Impeach Bush

Solidifying its reputation for being among the most liberal states in the union, several towns in Vermont closed ranks with the far left and voted to impeach President Bush at town meeting this past week.

Unlike the rest of America where elected officials set the pace for town business, Vermonters are able to enjoy the ability to place whatever inane whim crosses their path on the docket for city business. In this case, lefties voted to urge their representative to impeach the President.

With antics like this, how VT has a Republican governor is beyond me- even if he would probably fall under the Rino variety a la Lincoln Chafee.

Who would have thought the New England town meeting would devolve to become a good argument against direct democracy?

Is Coffee Bad?

My inclination, naturally, is to say "no." But a recent article in the American Journal of Medicine indicates the opposite could be true.

The study found: "This research suggests that heavy coffee drinkers who break down caffeine more slowly may have a slightly increased risk of having a heart attack.

"However, for most people other lifestyle choices, such as smoking, diet and exercise, are far more likely to affect their heart health than the occasional cup of coffee."

I plan on maintaining my three cups a day minimum. I'd rather be awake during the mornings than half asleep. Scientists. What do they know?

Bloggers for Wal-mart

Apparently, the latest outrage in our humble blogosphere is the enlistment of several, notable blogs behind retail giant Wal-mart. The NY Times broke the story yesterday, outlining a novel media campaign by Wal-mart to curry public support after sustaining a series of public relations injuries due to their low pay and scant health benefits.

Wal-mart sent out talking points a few weeks back to "pro Wal-mart" blogs, which then talked falling prices about the company's good deed. The idea was to defend the company in print and build up public support on local blogs.

I can't say I smell a controversy. In fact, I give Wal-mart a hat tip for their ingenuity. Their public relations folks are doing a good job of utilizing new technologies to communicate a message about their company. The move is not really a new milieu for advertising so much as it is common knowledge and common sense in a world of rapid communication and information- one other hand Wal-mart's competitors would do well to emulate their communications operation (fortunately, the Democrats haven't figured it out yet either).

In all, the story seems more like one of those innocuous blurbs we bloggers really like to blow out of proportion- while searching for a conspiracy which is not there. Logic indicates that companies will seek to defend their reputation. They will do so by whatever means and media they have at their disposal. An increasing force in the information age is the use of blogs. Therefore companies turn to blogs to communicate their message. It really doesn't even seem all that ingenuous.

I think the controversy, if one is to be constructed, lies in the fact that the bloggers in question used talking points and factoids from Wal-mart directly in some of their posts without citing the source (in this case, the source was the company they were defending). Perhaps some lucky soul's were even paid for their defense. Nevertheless, even if there was an absence of citation, I hardly think it matters all that much. The post amounts to little more than a Google advertisement on the side bar.

Unfortunately, yours truly was not among the lucky few chosen for paid posting. This little blurb for Wal-mart comes free of charge.

Evolutionary Breakthrough?

Usually I refrain from blogging during the day, but the above link was too delicious to pass up.

A family of five in Turkey who walk on all fours, using their hands as feet has been discovered by scientists. According to the experts, the family is forced to walk in this manner due to a "genetic condition," which is said to offer profound insight into human evolutionary development.

The article says, "An extraordinary family who walk on all fours are being hailed as the breakthrough discovery which could shed light on the moment Man first stood upright."

Give me a break people.

Since when does one, random family of five in Turkey that happens to be weird and walk on all fours suddenly constitute an evolutionary breakthrough?

It's no wonder scientists are besieged with issues of credibility.

Brokeback Mountain Upset at Oscars

Despite having won the hearts of Hollywood's liberal elite, and having won nearly every major independent film festival, Brokeback Mountain still fell short of the Oscar's most coveted prize.

Claiming the Oscar for best motion picture was the film "Crash," directed by Paul Haggis.

NFL Players Leave Talks in Labor Negotiations

The news out of NYC is that the NFL players union left talks with team owners, leaving many veteran players in danger of being cut from team rosters due to the league’s salary cap.

Let me say first, I know this appears to be a bad situation for many of the league's older players, and undoubtedly this is the case. However, I find it very hard to be sympathetic toward the NFL players union because the entire premise of their negotiations represent the antithesis of what a union is supposed to be. A union is, at least in theory, is a collective bargaining entity for under-paid and over-worked, working class employees. NFL athletes hardly fit even this loose definition.

But more to the point, I mean, who really feels sorry for these poor multi-million dollar athletes with their stretch Hummer limousines, mansions and Nike contracts? It is one thing to represent construction workers who aren’t given a fair wage, it's another to represent athletes who earn more money in a season than many will see in their lifetimes.

And the tragedy of the situation, given the definition of union above, is that despite making mega-bucks the players still aren't satisfied. Like many pro-sports in general, the bottom line for the NFL isn't the love of the game. This hasn’t been the case for a while. The bottom line has become, well the bottom line for much of corporate America: show me the money.

In the case of the NFL players union, what trumps all is greed and a mind set that values “bling” over the blitz; one the prizes tax credits over touchdowns.

Democrats: The Party of No

As discussed yesterday in my commentary on the Senate Intelligence Committee, the NY Times has now seen fit to corroborate my analysis with an article in today's publication.

Noting the Democrats, shall we say, rather nuanced political strategy of what I will call "party messages" as opposed to "party message," the Times lambastes the Dems for their abject failure to offer a cogent alternative to Republican domination.

And criticize the Democrats they should. Of 435 House seats, only 32 are considered competitive in the 2006 elections, eleven of which are held by the Democrats themselves.

Sounds like Howie Dean needs a pink slip.

An Official Religion for Missouri?

Only if you believe the spin some of the blogs are putting on this story. The liberal blog Atrios aided by KMOV TV out of St. Louis, MO, allege that a bill introduced by Rep. David Sater in the Missouri State Legislature would name Christianity the official Religion of the State of MO.

In the grand tradition of the "Show Me State," I will now show you exactly why this is not the case.

First, it will help to actually read the actual text of House Concurrent Resolution 13 of the 93rd General Assembly of the State of Missouri, which can be found here.

As you can see, anyone who takes the time to glance at the text will observe that no where in the bill does it claim Christianity is the official religion of the state. What the bill does address is the right of voluntary school prayer and religious displays on public property- quite a different focus but all the same to the anti-Christian left.

While the bill does state the founding fathers' recognition of a Christian God and it does affirms the right of citizens to freely express their religious beliefs, it falls far short of endorsing a Christian God. Instead, the bill uses rather bland language in stating recognition of a "Greater Power."

What is controversial about the measure is that it maintains and affirms citizens right to voluntary school prayer and religious displays on public property- the last vestiges of liberalism's heyday. Not only is the bill less than it is purported to be, it is also less than novel. Sponsor, David Sater has also introduced such legislation on numerous occasions, including recent legislation dealing with other controversial issues such as abortion, striking requirements to teach contraception methods in public schools and midwifery. In turn, the only thing making this bill extraordinary is the latent hostility of the anti-Christian left toward its adoption.

Making Sense of the Senate Intelligence Committee Fiasco

Most of the major news outlets have already picked up on this story, but I thought it worth mentioning because it offers an interesting lens through which we can evaluate politics in America at this point in time.

By way of introduction, the latest dissent within the Senate Intelligence Committee, stems from a partisan divide on the legality of the President's Domestic surveillance program. Senate Democrats have been hankering for months to hold a public committee inquiry into the nature of the program, while Republicans argue that a better use of the committee's agenda is to focus on international areas of concern such as Iran, North Korea and China.

True to form, there are several interpretations for the division. Democrats argue that Republicans have used the committee to rubber stamp the President's agenda- one with which they vehemently disagree. Republicans contend that Democrats want the hearings only to create a political circus replete with media field day- a hearing with the chief aim being to exploit the divisive program for political advantage.

Likely the truth is somewhere in the middle- perhaps a bit right of center, however. The Demcrats, although not entirely misguided in their desire for increased Congressional oversight, are almost certainly less than altruistic in their motives. First of all, the political mayhem hearings on the domestic surveillance program would bring to the Hill and the bad publicity it would create for the White House make the attempt far too suspect to be completely genuine.

Second, closed door hearings on the program have already been held. The problem for Senate Democrats is that the hearings, necessarily, generated little media attention and, thus, little bad press for the White House. It turns out that the media is simply not apt to cover a hearing in which their favorite Democrat cannot make ubiquitous, inane talking points.

As a result, the ACLU was quick to denounce the hearings for their alleged lack of "transparency," ironic given that the committee itself was formed to discuss classified issues of intelligence. It seems then that the true motivation for another hearing is to create the bad press Democrats need in substitute for a real agenda in the 2006 elections.

What should be done? If the Democrats were truly motivated by a desire for increased Congressional oversight, then the hearings which have already been held should suffice. Instead, they should offer real policy alternatives which seek to address the accountability issue of the NSA. Playing politics with National security is neither a smart move politically nor morally. But again, the problem for Democrats is the Democratic leadership. The party simply has no real ideas to offer Americans. They have no strategy, no agenda and no vision for intelligence apart from saying no to Republicans.

Until Democrats leave the party of no platform they cannot expect to win public support even in areas of Republican vulnerability.

Christian Broadcasters Oust Robertson

Despite having pioneered the Christian broadcast movement, Pat Robertson found himself on the short end of victory today when he was not re-elected as a member on the board of the National Religions Broadcasters.

It's a strong statement for the Christian community to hold Mr. Robertson to account for his hateful words this past year. Robertson called for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and suggested that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's tragic stroke was God's retribution for withdrawing from the West Bank.

Team Robertson explained away the loss noting that ole Pat maintains a busy schedule and was unable to attend most of the meetings anyway.

Scientists Use Scare Tactics in Global Warming Debate

Following a tradition of reporting only dire news, a team of scientists from Cambridge University (no, not Cambridge, MA) are heralding the end of land based astronomy, saying that telescopes will be "worthless" by the year 2050.

When will scientists stop trying to scare people? The problems with the models are rife and it's not as if scientists do not have a vested interest in perpetuating the scare story. At the very least, they stand to lose millions in grants and publishing opportunities if the global warming fiasco goes the way of the dinosaurs.

In the end, it really becomes a problem of information proliferation. Each side has their own set of facts, and the 'truthiness' of it all is that no one can really say with certainty what the future holds. My personal beef is that scientists are often portrayed as objective pools of knowledge when in fact, they have as much stake in having the discussion as any other industry. Big pool of knowledge alright. A cesspool.

NBC's David Gregory Disgraced

In a phone call to the Imus in the Morning show, NBC's David Gregory was blatantly drunk and forced to hang up from his call.

Gregory is NBC's White House Correspondent.

New Game

This game is incredibly addictive! 20.156 seconds is my personal best!

Can anyone beat my score?

OK Fires Near Walters

In a bit of news quite pertinent to my friends and family back home, many of the wild fires are only one county away from the area in which I grew up.

Wild fires have destroyed 8 homes in nearby Stephens County where we played football on occasion against Comanche.

As you can tell from the map at right, Cotton County where my hometown of Walters is located can be located in in the far right-hand corner of the map. Stephens County is located directly to the right of there.

Dry weather is expected through the remainder of week with a chance of rain on Friday and Saturday.

If you're so inclined, say a prayer on this Ash Wednesday for the Sooner State and her proud people fighting the fires.

Should the Smithsonian Go Gangsta?

Maybe so, according to the National Museum of American History.

The Smithsonian Institution down in Washington in its commitment to cultural preservation has announced plans to open an exhibit dedicated to the beats and rhymes of the hip-hop music scene.

No Doubt all the No Limit Soldiers will be out in force traveling the 8 Mile, hoping for their chance to Busta Rhymes at the new exhibit. Keep in mind these groups are not Above the Law and should be held to account. This is not to say that the groups are a big Public Enemy who deserve a good kick in the Chops. But our standards really should be higher than my Little Brother. I mean, do we really want the Atmosphere in America to be only a step away from Danger & Doom? I wouldn't even pay a 50 Cent piece for some of this music. Unfortunately this is all too coMMon and none of it is an Exact Science. My Great-Aunt Nelly would roll over in her grave. I guess this makes me miss country music more than anything. I feel like going home and eating some Black Eyed Peas.

Well, not really. But the paragraph does give you a good idea of the types of groups affiliated with hip-hop music and the foolishness of it all.

What will they waste our tax dollars on next?

Democrats Strategy Leaked

Consistent with their record the past two elections and much to Hillary's consternation, Democrats have had their strategy for victory leaked- this time by the Onion.

Admittedly, it's a great work of parody but what makes it funny is how close to the truth it actually is.

Going into the 2006 elections, Democrats have no ideas, no plan and no direction. Even the rank and file among Dems are pessimistic about making gains come November.

The warning to Republicans, however, is not to follow suit along the Democrats' disillusioned path to political nowhere (how's that for alliteration).

*Thanks to http://www.usasurvival.org/images/hillary.jpg for the wonderful pic.
 

Pax Plena Copyright © 2011 -- Template created by O Pregador -- Powered by Blogger